Re: copy limitations in NTFS?
- From: "NewbieSupreme" <newbiesupreme@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:25:26 -0500
I assume that was to show the time on the header, and I saw that this
(non-problem) PC was set to Pacific, not Eastern. However, I have checked
the problem PC (I'm not posting from that one), and the zone and time are
correct.
Again, these posts are sent from a PC which I do NOT have any of these
problems on.
Thanks again
"Gerry Cornell" <gcjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ODsxrLUIGHA.2696@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:49:54 -0600
> From: "NewbieSupreme" <newbiesupreme@xxxxxxxxx>
> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.basics
> References: <HtadnUy2Jb86C0veRVn-pQ@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> <OGoLC3TIGHA.2320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: copy limitations in NTFS?
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:50:46 -0800
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
> Message-ID: <wM-dnadwB-G_IEveRVn-vw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Lines: 101
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.43.126.137
>
> --
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Gerry
> ~~~~
> FCA
> Stourport, England
>
> Enquire, plan and execute
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> "NewbieSupreme" <newbiesupreme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:wM-dnadwB-G_IEveRVn-vw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Gerry:
>>
>> Thanks very much for the post.
>>
>> The clock is not wrong, I checked this after someone else said this was
>> the problem from another post (repeated and incessant "delayed write" and
>> "$mfg" errors. I set the clock right according to local time, and I
>> UNchecked using Internet time in the clock's properties, because it kept
>> screwing my time up, even though I had the right zone. If it's 2 or 3
>> seconds off the U.S. officicial atomic clock, is that a problem? BTW,
>> the post is being sent from a different PC than the problem one, but the
>> clock's right on this one too.
>>
>> There is PLENTY of space all over the place; this is all coming off a
>> complete wipe and fresh install, to recover from those delayed write
>> errors and data being lost on one of the SATA drives. The data I'm using
>> has been copied from external USB drives, which I fille dup in a panic
>> when my data was being lost during the $mft errors, etc.
>>
>> The method for copying from one drive to another is just to use Windows
>> XP's drag-drop in Windows Explorer. To copy on one drive, I just use the
>> cntrl+c/cntrl+v shortcut keys while in Windows Explorer.
>>
>> There is no Norton protection on recycle bin.
>>
>> Any other sugestions from anyone?
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>>
>> "Gerry Cornell" <gcjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:OGoLC3TIGHA.2320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Well your clock is wrong for a start.
>>>
>>> What programme are you using to copy?
>>>
>>> How much free space on each hard disk?
>>>
>>> To increase you free space on your C select Start, All Programs,
>>> Accessories, System Tools, Disk CleanUp, More Options, System Restore
>>> and
>>> remove all but the latest System Restore points? Restore points can be
>>> quite
>>> large.
>>>
>>> You should use Disk CleanUp regularly to Empty your Recycle Bin and
>>> Remove Temporary Internet Files. Whenever you remove redundant files you
>>> should always run Disk Defragmenter by selecting Start, All Programs,
>>> Accessories, System Tools, Disk Defragmenter.
>>>
>>> Do you have a Norton Protected Recycle Bin?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Hope this helps.
>>>
>>> Gerry
>>> ~~~~
>>> FCA
>>> Stourport, England
>>>
>>> Enquire, plan and execute
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> "NewbieSupreme" <newbiesupreme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:HtadnUy2Jb86C0veRVn-pQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>I get an error that the system is out of resources when copying a large
>>>>number of lrage files. In searching the newsgroups, it appears
>>>>limitations only exist in windows 2000. My configuration is as follows:
>>>>
>>>> - AMD 64FX CPU
>>>> - 1Gb RAM
>>>> - 2 250 Gb Western Digital SATA drives cables to SATA ports on mobo
>>>> - 1 100Gb Western Digital IDE drive ribboned to blue IDE port on mobo
>>>> - Windows XP Pro, all current service packs/fixes installed (OS is on
>>>> 1st SATA drive)
>>>>
>>>> I'm attempting to copy 48 Gb (356,000 files in 20,000 folders) from one
>>>> SATA drive to another, and also tried from one SATA to the IDE. After
>>>> about an hour of copying, I get an error that the system ran out of
>>>> resources. This seems to be a pretty kickass configuration to have
>>>> this problem; does anyone know what might be causing this? I tried
>>>> once while running a couple instances of ie in the background, and once
>>>> with nothing running in background. I've run a complete updated Norton
>>>> virus scan on everything, and have checked the processes running during
>>>> copy, and nothing was taking up huge amounts of RAM or CPU capacity.
>>>>
>>>> I did some checking on caching and how to set page filing, etc., and
>>>> the numbers that exist in the current settings seem good enough to do
>>>> anything, although only one SATA is set to use page swapping (the one
>>>> w/ the OS on it). Is that the problem? Or do I need to set something
>>>> to have as much RAM or caching or pagefiling as amount of files being
>>>> copied?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for reading, any help, advice, tips, etc. would be greatly
>>>> appreciated.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: copy limitations in NTFS?
- From: Gerry Cornell
- Re: copy limitations in NTFS?
- References:
- copy limitations in NTFS?
- From: NewbieSupreme
- Re: copy limitations in NTFS?
- From: Gerry Cornell
- Re: copy limitations in NTFS?
- From: NewbieSupreme
- Re: copy limitations in NTFS?
- From: Gerry Cornell
- copy limitations in NTFS?
- Prev by Date: copy limitations in NTFS?
- Next by Date: Re: XP Wake-up ?
- Previous by thread: Re: copy limitations in NTFS?
- Next by thread: Re: copy limitations in NTFS?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|