Re: Is 224 MB RAM enough for XP?
- From: "D.Currie" <dmbcurrie.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:42:48 -0700
"Kenny" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uF9L1nM4FHA.3684@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Friend asked me if his PC was up to spec for XP, currently using ME.
> Duron 1800 CPU, 40 GB HDD & 256MB PC133 RAM but 32MB is shared video.
> I know XP requirements say 128MB is enough but I also know 256MB or more
> is more realistic.
> Assuming background apps and services are kept to a minimum will the 224MB
> be enough?
>
> --
> Kenny Cargill
>
It will be fine, if the person doesn't run any memory-intensive apps and
keeps the system lean and clean. However, most people end up accumulating
little applications or start turning on accessories, desktop widgets,
toolbars, chat programs, eye candy and other bits and pieces that start
sucking power.
The other thing is that computers today should have decent antivirus and
antispyware programs, and those will use resources as well. And if a bit of
spyware creeps in anyway, that computer's going to slow down pretty rapidly.
Another 128 or 256 is going to make a measurable difference in performance.
I'd add the ram if it's not some weird expensive stuff. In the long run, it
will make using the computer a lot more pleasant.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is 224 MB RAM enough for XP?
- From: Kenny
- Re: Is 224 MB RAM enough for XP?
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows Installer Appears every time I start spywareblaster
- Next by Date: Re: Is 224 MB RAM enough for XP?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is 224 MB RAM enough for XP?
- Next by thread: Re: Is 224 MB RAM enough for XP?
- Index(es):