Re: Question on XP slow operatoin
- From: "Ken Blake" <kblake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:21:38 -0700
In news:42ea59d1$1_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Don. <Me@xxxxxxx> typed:
> Ken Blake wrote:
>> In news:42ea54d0$1_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> Don. <Me@xxxxxxx> typed:
>>
>>
>>> I'm running Win98SE on this machine and it's 10 times faster
>>> than on
>>> my wife's machine. Her XP installation came from a "friend"
>>> who installed it in April.
>>
>>
>>
>> Are you complaining that XP runs slower than Windows 98? If
>> both
>> machines are Windows 98-era machines, that's not surprising.
>> XP's
>> hardware needs are much greater than 98's. In particular, for
>> almost everyone, unless you have at least 256MB of RAM, XP
>> won't
>> run at acceptable speeds.
>>
>
> Thanks for the QUICK reply, Ken. You are faster than her XP!
> ;-)
>
> I'm not shure how much RAM she had, I think it's 256MB and it
> was a
> WinME machine.
Please check and report back on her complete hardware
configuration.
> I see you snipped the question about Defragging an XP machine,
> does
> that mean you aren't familiar with that feature?
Sorry, I didn't notice that question. Can you repeat it?
> Thanks again...
You're welcome. Glad to help.
--
Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User
Please reply to the newsgroup
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question on XP slow operatoin
- From: Don.
- Re: Question on XP slow operatoin
- References:
- Question on XP slow operatoin
- From: Don.
- Re: Question on XP slow operatoin
- From: Ken Blake
- Re: Question on XP slow operatoin
- From: Don.
- Question on XP slow operatoin
- Prev by Date: Re: Question on XP slow operatoin
- Next by Date: Re: Can some of the MY folders be moved?
- Previous by thread: Re: Question on XP slow operatoin
- Next by thread: Re: Question on XP slow operatoin
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|