Re: Command.com or cmd.exe
- From: "George" <georgefour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 08:39:28 +0000 (UTC)
> > Hi!
> > With Windows XP Home, Epson Stylus Photo 810 printer, I run DOS
> > based programmes, called from batch files. Most work to an acceptable
> > level.
> > In QuickBasic, printing fails. (Print screen, nothing. LPRINT just
> > ejects a
> > blank ***)
> > In dBase IV, same.
> > With Windows updated, dBASE fails altogether, and give error message
> > that
> > there is something wrong with cmd.exe
> > I think someone once suggested that there is a difference between
>
Well, yes. Thanks for the info.
I have now tried the alternative, but no change in result.
Guess I will have to live with it!
Thanks again
george, who remembers "PRESS PLAY ON TAPE #1"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Command.com or cmd.exe
- From: Vanguard
- Re: Command.com or cmd.exe
- References:
- Command.com or cmd.exe
- From: George
- Re: Command.com or cmd.exe
- From: Vanguard
- Command.com or cmd.exe
- Prev by Date: Re: upgraded to XP from Win98 and now OS dosen't recognize second drive
- Next by Date: Re: Command.com or cmd.exe
- Previous by thread: Re: Command.com or cmd.exe
- Next by thread: Re: Command.com or cmd.exe
- Index(es):