Is SP2 really necessary?
From: Happy (happy_at_trial.ca)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: Walter Clayton: "Re: Network Bridge"
- Previous message: Bert Kinney: "Re: Something odd with System Restore - Software Distribution Service 2.0 and Installed Your Application Name"
- Next in thread: Walter Clayton: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: Walter Clayton: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: Colin Barnhorst: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: Carey Frisch [MVP]: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: Kevin: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: philo: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: Bob Harris: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: plb2862: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: Ken Blake: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:18:02 GMT
Just helping my brother put an older computer in order to be able to use
dial up, and word processing. I was considering loading SP2 on, and he asked
me the question" is it really necessary?" and "why not just a good virus
checker"? -- and I didn't have a good answer, being one who is used to
following along and listening to MS, (and sometimes BS!) without question!
What is the real answer?
- Next message: Walter Clayton: "Re: Network Bridge"
- Previous message: Bert Kinney: "Re: Something odd with System Restore - Software Distribution Service 2.0 and Installed Your Application Name"
- Next in thread: Walter Clayton: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: Walter Clayton: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: Colin Barnhorst: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: Carey Frisch [MVP]: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: Kevin: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: philo: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: Bob Harris: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: plb2862: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Reply: Ken Blake: "Re: Is SP2 really necessary?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|