minimum hard disk/cpu question
From: Dave Gower (davegow.removethis_at_magma.ca)
Date: 01/12/05
- Next message: Erik S. Daniel: "Re: Windows Explorer"
- Previous message: Alun Jones [MSFT]: "Re: What is the trick to get Windows XP firewall to stay on (after a reboot)?"
- Next in thread: Michael Solomon \(MS-MVP\): "Re: minimum hard disk/cpu question"
- Reply: Michael Solomon \(MS-MVP\): "Re: minimum hard disk/cpu question"
- Reply: Colin Barnhorst: "Re: minimum hard disk/cpu question"
- Reply: Michael Stevens: "Re: minimum hard disk/cpu question"
- Reply: Andrew Murray: "Re: minimum hard disk/cpu question"
- Reply: André Gulliksen: "Re: minimum hard disk/cpu question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:50:31 -0500
I've got a Panasonic Toughbook which I use for simple tasks (note-taking,
calculations, a little surfing). It works great and I would hate to throw it
away, but I am getting tired of the Win98 that it came with, which is far
inferior to XP that I have gotten used to on my main computer, and anyway is
way overdue for reinstall.
The Toughbook has a 64M CPU and a 2G HD. According to the Microsoft website,
64M is the minimum (128 recommended) and 1.5G disk space. Am I going to
encounter problems if I try to upgrade with hardware this close to the
minimum? Is it even worth it?
- Next message: Erik S. Daniel: "Re: Windows Explorer"
- Previous message: Alun Jones [MSFT]: "Re: What is the trick to get Windows XP firewall to stay on (after a reboot)?"
- Next in thread: Michael Solomon \(MS-MVP\): "Re: minimum hard disk/cpu question"
- Reply: Michael Solomon \(MS-MVP\): "Re: minimum hard disk/cpu question"
- Reply: Colin Barnhorst: "Re: minimum hard disk/cpu question"
- Reply: Michael Stevens: "Re: minimum hard disk/cpu question"
- Reply: Andrew Murray: "Re: minimum hard disk/cpu question"
- Reply: André Gulliksen: "Re: minimum hard disk/cpu question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]