Re: when to defrag?
From: johnf (john_f_at_bigREMOVEpond.net.au)
Date: 12/30/04
- Next message: Kenny: "System Restore vs "last known good configuration"."
- Previous message: André Gulliksen: "Re: when to defrag?"
- In reply to: André Gulliksen: "Re: when to defrag?"
- Next in thread: Frank Saunders, MS-MVP: "Re: when to defrag?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 21:15:43 +1100
A good addition to my reply.
I agree totally & reckon the combines replies cover the query completely.
-- johnf > kline wrote: >> How long should I leave it before defragging my hard drive under XP >> Home SP2? > > Depends on your usage. A volume that rarely experiences change does not > need to be defragged very often, if at all. > > Personally I like to check fragmentation after doing heavy system > maintenance, like adding or removing large applications, or installing > major updates. If I then see a lot of red, I defrag. If not, I don't. > >> I had thought that it should be done about once a month or >> so, but when I open the Disk Defragmenter program and run "analyse" >> it says that a defrag is not necessary. > > Then it probably is not necessary. > >> It must be about three months or so since I last defragged. The only >> slow down in performance I've noticed lately is that clearing the IE6 >> History takes longer that it used to... > > This sounds like normal behaviour on a system that has all user files > on the system volume, is frequently used for web surfing, and does not > get a lot of programs installed and/or removed to/from the system > volume. > If you are very concerned about the time to clear IE history (why?) > defrag. If not, don't. > >> I'm wary of just defragmenting for the sake of it as I've also read >> that doing this too often can have an adverse affect on stability - >> can any one confirm this? > > Well, a defrag does a pretty rough deassembly and reassembly of your > file system. It usually is not a problem, but _if_ something goes wrong > during the defrag process (this can be anything from a power outage to > a bug in the defrag software) you better start praying that you do not > lose anything vital. The chance of something like this actually > happening is slim, and it never happened once to me, but it is > possible. And the more often you defrag, the higher the risk you have > of eventually running into problems. > Second there is the issue of physical strain on your hard drives. If a > large file is fragmented your read/write heads will have to do a lot of > work to actually read it. So if you access this file often it is > logical that defragmenting it once will reduce overall workload on your > disk, since the file now can be accessed in a single clean sweep. > However, if a file is not likely to be accessed there is no such gain, > and thus a defrag will only be a waste of work and time, and will in > itself cause unnecessary work on your hard drive. So frequent defrags > just for the sake of having a neat recycle bin and IE cache will > probably reduce the overall lifetime of your hard drive, not to mention > be a waste of your precious time.
- Next message: Kenny: "System Restore vs "last known good configuration"."
- Previous message: André Gulliksen: "Re: when to defrag?"
- In reply to: André Gulliksen: "Re: when to defrag?"
- Next in thread: Frank Saunders, MS-MVP: "Re: when to defrag?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|