Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority
From: hermes (hermes_at_messenger.net)
Date: 06/23/04
- Next message: Gene K: "Re: Hard Drive Back-up"
- Previous message: hermes: "Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority"
- In reply to: Bruce Chambers: "Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority"
- Next in thread: HillBillyBuddhist: "Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:09:22 -0500
Bruce Chambers wrote:
> Greetings --
>
> That might do, but they should also email the pertinent legal
> authorities the IP addresses of all pirated copies.
>
> Bruce Chambers
I disagree, Bruce. That would be a major invasion of privacy. And no
way is any corporation with questionable practices going to be allowed
to decide if I have pirated copies. This would be because of the
unconcionable EULA they have which violates my fair use rights.
-- hermes DRM sux! Treacherous Computing kills our virtual civil liberties! http://www.redrival.com/protectfreedom/ http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/tcpa-faq.html http://anti-dmca.org/ http://www.eff.org/IP/DMCA/unintended_consequences.php Windows XP crashed. I am the Blue Screen of Death. No one hears your screams.
- Next message: Gene K: "Re: Hard Drive Back-up"
- Previous message: hermes: "Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority"
- In reply to: Bruce Chambers: "Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority"
- Next in thread: HillBillyBuddhist: "Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
