Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority
From: Bruce Chambers (bchambers_at_nospamcableone.net)
Date: 06/23/04
- Next message: ***: "Message reads "This operation has been cancelled........"
- Previous message: David Candy: "Re: XP hides autoexec.bat"
- In reply to: Jim Macklin: "Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority"
- Next in thread: Jim Macklin: "Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority"
- Reply: Jim Macklin: "Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority"
- Reply: hermes: "Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:59:20 -0600
Greetings --
That might do, but they should also email the pertinent legal
authorities the IP addresses of all pirated copies.
Bruce Chambers
-- Help us help you: http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having both at once. - RAH "Jim Macklin" <p51mustang[threeX12]@xxxhotmail.calm> wrote in message news:eNekjbFWEHA.1012@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl... > Well, what if MS allowed updates to pirated copies of XP, > but put up a large watermark on the display that was always > visible, saying "Your copy illegal, contact "URL" for > instructions" and this watermark would cover a 640x480 area > centered in the display.? > > > > -- > The people think the Constitution protects their rights; > But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. > >
- Next message: ***: "Message reads "This operation has been cancelled........"
- Previous message: David Candy: "Re: XP hides autoexec.bat"
- In reply to: Jim Macklin: "Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority"
- Next in thread: Jim Macklin: "Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority"
- Reply: Jim Macklin: "Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority"
- Reply: hermes: "Re: Microsoft declares security is NOT its top priority"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]