Re: NTFS become RAW
From: Ted (&&&&&&&&&&&)
Date: 06/11/04
- Next message: Pop: "Re: * Multiple Monitor - Nivida on XP Pro *"
- Previous message: David Candy: "Re: Notepad"
- In reply to: Jim Macklin: "Re: NTFS become RAW"
- Next in thread: Jim Macklin: "Re: NTFS become RAW"
- Reply: Jim Macklin: "Re: NTFS become RAW"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:54:57 GMT
"Jim Macklin" <p51mustang[threeX12]@xxxhotmail.calm> wrote in message
news:ONASCr7TEHA.1048@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I have a lot more faith in the moral position of the USA.
> The Nazi submarines were sent out in teams they called wolf
> packs for exactly the reason stated.
>
> You will recall that the World Trade Center was attacked
> before Iraq was liberated. Poor political and military
> actions in VN and later in Somalia have led some to think
> the USA is an easy target. Do I think we are doing the job
> as I would do it were I President, No! Just read and
> understand my sig...
>
> --
> The people think the Constitution protects their rights;
> But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome.
>
> I think there are many targets in the USA that could be
> attacked and would do great harm to the nation. I have told
> my Congressman and the FBI what I see as targets. I also
> think that the bureaucrats are using "the war on terrorism"
> as a lever to expand government. The TSA has been very slow
> in compliance with the law requiring that airline pilots be
> armed.
>
> Your trying to claim that the current USA is a Nazi
> operation is offensive and wrong headed in my opinion.
>
> Since you seem to think that the defeat of the USA would be
> a "good thing" and that the fact that 25 years ago the
> communists controlled most of Asia, much of Europe, Africa
> and South/Central America and today, due mostly to the USA
> and Ronald Reagan's policies (with some communist resurgence
> due to the pervert named Clinton) most of the world's
> people live in freedom from communism, even China may become
> free within 20 years if we don't get the end of the world
> they keep talking about in 2012 on Coast 2 Coast (Art Bell,
> the same guy who wrote that comedy THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW.
>
>
> "Ted" <&&&&&&&&&&&> wrote in message
> news:2d97df1c4da54b5a87d0d3dcaca4c222@news.teranews.com...
> |
> | "Jim Macklin" <p51mustang[threeX12]@xxxhotmail.calm> wrote
> in message
> | news:%23ywd8E7TEHA.1284@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> | > The best way to have peace is to be strong enough to win
> any
> | > war and known to be willing to win the war. As the Fonz
> | > said to Ritchie, (slightly paraphrased) You have to have
> hit
> | > somebody before and repeat as needed. Or Ben Franklin,
> "The
> | > tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of
> | > patriots."
> | >
> | > Weakness encourages attack, just watch a pack of wolves
> | > after the caribou.
> | >
> |
> | That is a poor anaolgy, unless you're suggesting that this
> current Reich
> | acts on the same instinctive biological functions to that
> of wolfpacks (also
> | a nom de plume given to certain nazi fighting groups!). If
> so, then I can
> | accept that, since the power of reasoning is an inherent
> particular to
> | humans more so than instinct, with the former not easily
> exhibited from the
> | current ameriKKKan Reichstag.
> |
> |
> |
You put words in my mouth, as I didn't hint that a defeat of the USA would
be a good thing. This how poor arguments ensue, by making cases that don't
exist to favor your position. The USA doesn't look out for the democracies
of other countries, let alone their own. they represent how a real democracy
shouldn't work.
In one example, they dismount the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, which is OK
by me, because the rest of the world was behind this, and gave support; they
didn't do this in Iraq. They lied about WMD, now they admit it, but use the
reasoning that they removed a tyrant, OK!
If they are for creating democracies by removing tyrants (though Bush in his
last campaign stated that he isn't in the business of nation building), then
why doesn't he go after the other brutal governments in the world, if that
is the new reasoning. Also, this administration uses the bases in former
Soviet republics to perform their activities in Afghanistan that is as
brutal as was the Taliban.
Good thinking and consistent for promoting what the USA thinks is right for
other nations. Use the military installations of those countries that commit
crimes against their own people, to remove a regime that committed crimes
against its own people, in return for economic and military aid! Where's the
democracy in this? Where looking out for "all" people?
Why is it when you go to most other democracies in the world, all people in
those countries live among each other, yet in the USA, they have distinct,
and relatively poor minority areas that have blacks, Hispanics, etals other
than whites, living in areas of their own. They are typically poor, and
their is still rampant discrimination there, where is the democracy, where
is the unity?
The USA should not try to democratize other nations (they should try their
own first) that may not want their style of democracy, and why they are the
only one nation that does this, should be testament to why they shouldn't.
- Next message: Pop: "Re: * Multiple Monitor - Nivida on XP Pro *"
- Previous message: David Candy: "Re: Notepad"
- In reply to: Jim Macklin: "Re: NTFS become RAW"
- Next in thread: Jim Macklin: "Re: NTFS become RAW"
- Reply: Jim Macklin: "Re: NTFS become RAW"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
