Re: NTFS on 8.3gig hd?

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

From: Al Dykes (adykes_at_panix.com)
Date: 04/17/04 

Date: 17 Apr 2004 14:17:24 -0400

In article <pun280p29s8cc7j8k2dp29o6lu2q82ak90@4ax.com>,
Clinton Fitch <management@clintonfitchabsolutelynonspammythankie.com> wrote:
>NTFS stores data more efficently that FAT or FAT32. This will give
>you more storage space on your drive as you put more and more files
>onto the system. Further, NTFS allows for more security options than
>FAT or FAT32 such as encryption.
>
>If you are comfortable with FAT32 then you don't necessarily have to
>change.
>
>Regards,
>
>Clinton R. Fitch III
>Partner
>C3 Technology
>http://www.c3-technology.com
>
>
>On Sat, 17 Apr 2004 16:44:21 GMT, "craig" <craig618@hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Should I convert FAT32 files to NTFS fileson a hard drive with 8.3 gig
>>memory?
>>
>>Anything wrong with keeping FAT32 on 8.3gig?
>>

NTFS gives you the option to turn on compression. You can compress
existing data, and if you set the compression property on a directory
anything you put there will be compressed. Compression is utterly
transparent to your applications. Compress/decompress is done at the
file system level. YMMV as to how must space compression gets
you. I've seen 20:1 compression for ascii numeric data. OTOH TIF image
files compress very little.

I've compressed the entire C drive (C:\ and everything under it) many
times on systems that needed space. This was when we had 2GB disks.
I've never seen NTFS compression screw up.

There is no downside to compression that I can see, except I wouldn't
put a serious database there becuse a record insertion would require
the decompression/recompression of the entire file. The CPU cycles
needed to compress or decompress are offset by the reduction in the
number of blocks that need to be moved from the disk. 

-- 
Al Dykes
-----------
adykes  at p a n i x . c o m

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Fat32 vs NTFS ?
    ... With NTFS, the data is distributed around the drive, meaning that if you ... or sequentially across the disk. ... Because the fragmentation map doesn't look as pretty, ... If compression was disabled, the drive would have had to read 4GB, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: FAT32 or NTSF
    ... FAT32 has no security capabilities, no compression ... project for school in Word and his XP in NTFS has suddenly crashed. ... Does it really matter with the super large hard drives ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: atcfwchg error #7
    ... If you need to get control over individual file and directory security ... settings, and/or compression, NTFS is the better solution. ... ...but do you think NTFS is a plus enough to ... with the fixed/removable or just switch over to a FAT file structure? ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.embedded)
  • Re: Oh no, my code is being published ... help!
    ... Please check your hard disk partition is NTFS or FAT32 if it is FAT32 ... Lets say, for example that you have, as I do, a large directory tree ... Both 7sqz and 7usqz use p7zip for the actual compression, ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: File Compression (native NTFS) - help settle an argument
    ... "While NTFS file system compression can save disk space, ... more noticeable on servers, which are frequently processor-bound. ... loaded servers with a lot of write traffic are poor candidates for data ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)