Re: installing patches w/o being admin
From: serverguy (nospammers_at_spambites.com)
Date: 03/01/04
- Previous message: serverguy: "Re: annoying and nagging toolbar"
- Maybe in reply to: David E: "installing patches w/o being admin"
- Next in thread: gadz: "Re: installing patches w/o being admin"
- Reply: gadz: "Re: installing patches w/o being admin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 16:21:03 -0500
If you are the administrator of the pc, why not just do your administrative
duties and download the updates while you are logged in? Why depend on
non-admins to do the updates? What if there is an error druing the process?
Do you think the non-admins will be able to handle the situation?
Otherwise, SUS is the best solution for you - users do not need to be admins
for the updates to be applied.
"dejavu" <dejavu_0911@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:164f01c3fbb6$6880d880$a101280a@phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> I am the administrator of my computer which runs on
> win2K. I have other people who can log into the machine
> as users of a particular network domain setup on the
> machine. I was wondering if it was possible for me to
> schedule the automatic updates for the machine such that
> the updates are downloaded, prompts for installation and
> also installs when the non-administrator is logged in.
>
> In other words, would the updates be possible only if the
> user has administrative powers or is there another
> possibility? I know that it is possible to distribute the
> updates from the central server. But, can we do it at a
> more local level?
>
>
> Thank you.
- Previous message: serverguy: "Re: annoying and nagging toolbar"
- Maybe in reply to: David E: "installing patches w/o being admin"
- Next in thread: gadz: "Re: installing patches w/o being admin"
- Reply: gadz: "Re: installing patches w/o being admin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|