Re: Client Drive Redirection Issues after Upgrade...Please help...

From: Patrick Rouse [MVP] (PatrickRouseMVP_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 08/07/04

  • Next message: Atreju: "Re: Anyone here use Vic Hi Tech clients?"
    Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 15:13:01 -0700
    
    

    You may either search groups.google.com for others who may have experienced
    this problem, or open a PSS call with Microsoft to fix the problem.

    As far as not wanting to do a clean install, it's wise to always have an
    image level backup of your production terminal servers that you can revert to
    in case a virus, disk failure or an application installation goes bad.

    If you have roaming TS profiles the reinstall of a single TS + applications
    should take no more than 4 hours, i.e. 1 hour for the OS + 3 hours to setup
    whatever apps you use.

    I have 4 production citrix metaframe servers and I can guinea-pig one of
    them if I want to introduce a new application, since the other 3 machines can
    sufficiently handle the entire user load. If something goes wrong I can take
    the server offline and restore from backup or from an image.

    If you're unsure of how some of your apps install on a TS then testing on a
    lab computer is advised. You can even do a clean install on a different hard
    disk, and set aside the current one in case you can't get the system
    functioning in time for users to begin work.

    "James Crane" wrote:

    >
    > I know it will work fine with a clean install.....that's what I'm
    > trying to avoid though....
    >
    > On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 06:11:02 -0700, "Patrick Rouse [MVP]"
    > <PatrickRouseMVP@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
    >
    > >I have never seen this problem before and would suggest that you setup a test
    > >box that is a clean install, not an upgrade from 2000 and see if yoou have
    > >the same problem.
    > >
    > >Although the upgrade from 2000 to 2003 is farily painless, I've found that a
    > >lot of people do this on single terminal server systems w/o testing first,
    > >which is asking for trouble.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >"James Crane" wrote:
    > >
    > >> Also, I'm not the only person experiencing this. Here are some posts
    > >> from the microsoft.public.windowsnt.terminalserver.client group :
    > >>
    > >> From: "KIWI" <john_hastie@nospamhotmail.com>
    > >> Subject: Local drive mappings
    > >> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:51:58 -0700
    > >> Lines: 16
    > >> X-Priority: 3
    > >> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    > >> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2149
    > >> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2149
    > >> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
    > >> Message-ID: <#rTtZWPdEHA.1644@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
    > >> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsnt.terminalserver.client
    > >> NNTP-Posting-Host: 207-232-119-188.ip.van.radiant.net 207.232.119.188
    > >> Path: TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
    > >> Xref: TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl
    > >> microsoft.public.windowsnt.terminalserver.client:12844
    > >>
    > >> Hi
    > >>
    > >> I have a couple of Windows 2003 Terminal Servers and even though the
    > >> local
    > >> resources disk drive option is selected the drives do not map when
    > >> connected
    > >> using the Win XP client. I do not have any issues on other W2K3
    > >> Terminal
    > >> Servers and the only thing different with these 2 is that they were
    > >> upgraded
    > >> machines initally running Windows 2000 TS.
    > >>
    > >> I'm thinking htere is some legacy piece or dll file that has remained
    > >> from
    > >> the Windows 2000 installation and rather than comletely rebuild the
    > >> servers
    > >> I'd like to know if anyone has any ideas on getting them to work
    > >> correctly.
    > >>
    > >> TIA
    > >> KIWI
    > >>
    > >> -------------------------------------------------
    > >>
    > >> From: jeffstrong@comcast.net (Jeff)
    > >> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsnt.terminalserver.client
    > >> Subject: Terminal server 2003 local drive access not available non
    > >> admin
    > >> Date: 31 Jul 2004 06:48:18 -0700
    > >> Organization: http://groups.google.com
    > >> Lines: 11
    > >> Message-ID: <bf90e941.0407310548.5e77a57@posting.google.com>
    > >> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.83.123.216
    > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    > >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    > >> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1091281698 3143 127.0.0.1 (31 Jul 2004
    > >> 13:48:18 GMT)
    > >> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
    > >> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 13:48:18 +0000 (UTC)
    > >> Path:
    > >> TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!proxad.net!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
    > >> Xref: TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl
    > >> microsoft.public.windowsnt.terminalserver.client:12851
    > >>
    > >> Performed an upgrade from terminal server 2000 to 2003. This is a
    > >> member server of a domain. Added the appropriate users to the local
    > >> Remote Desktop Users group to allow them login. The users can login,
    > >> but to not see local redirected drives even if checking the option in
    > >> the RDP client. However, if a user is a member of the terminal
    > >> server's local administrator's group, they do see the drives. I
    > >> obviously can't leave everyone a member of the local computer's admin
    > >> group. I've done a new install of a 2003 terminal server before and
    > >> didn't have this issue. Is there a security setting that I'm missing
    > >> somwhere? Permission compatibility is set to Relaxed Security. Any
    > >> help is much appreciated.
    > >>
    > >>
    > >> On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 07:03:14 -0400, James Crane
    > >> <administrator@*nospam*westlawngraphic.com> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >
    > >> >Thanks for the response Patrick.....
    > >> >
    > >> >Why does moving them to the local Administrators group on the terminal
    > >> >server fix the problem without changing any other settings on their
    > >> >user account then? The users are not even in an OU in Active
    > >> >Directory, they are in the ordinary Users container. If it was a GPO
    > >> >that was causing this, moving them to the local Adminstrators group on
    > >> >the terminal server should have no effect, since a GPO overrides any
    > >> >local policies.... This is not a client issue either. Connecting
    > >> >from the same machine as the same user maps the drives when they are
    > >> >members of the local Administrators group on the terminal server. As
    > >> >soon as you remove them from the Administrators group and place them
    > >> >in the Remote Desktop Users group, the drives stop redirecting. It
    > >> >definitely seems like a permissions problem at the terminal server
    > >> >itself....almost like the upgrade failed to grant the proper
    > >> >permissions to the Remote Desktop Users group.
    > >> >
    > >> >
    > >> >
    > >> >On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 21:25:01 -0700, "Patrick Rouse [MVP]"
    > >> ><PatrickRouseMVP@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
    > >> >
    > >> >>This can be disabled in the user's account, at the server level or via GPO.
    > >> >>Make sure the end user is using Remote Desktop Client 5.1 or higher and that
    > >> >>they have disk drives checked in the local devices section.
    > >> >>
    > >> >>
    > >> >>
    > >> >>"James Crane" wrote:
    > >> >>
    > >> >>>
    > >> >>> After upgrading a Windows 2000 Server terminal server to Windows
    > >> >>> Server 2003, only local Administrators of the terminal server can have
    > >> >>> their local drives redirect in their RDP session. If I add the users
    > >> >>> to the local Administrators groups, their drives will redirect also.
    > >> >>> Obviously, I don't want to give all my domain users full
    > >> >>> administrative privileges of the terminal server..... Is their a
    > >> >>> local policy that I need to configure to allow Remote Desktop Users
    > >> >>> the ability to redirect their local drives??
    > >> >>>
    > >> >>> Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.....
    > >> >>>
    > >> >>> Jim
    > >> >>>
    > >>
    > >>
    >
    >


  • Next message: Atreju: "Re: Anyone here use Vic Hi Tech clients?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Entropy
      ... Every 11 minutes I get a mail from my servers but instead of it ... containing -- which is what Greg is getting it contains this: ... clean install so it is probably some software that I installed that may have ... My env is as such: ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • RE: Migrating from 2000 to 2003 - Clean install but keep shares???
      ... Regarding printer server migration: ... Regarding share folder migration: ... Migrating from 2000 to 2003 - Clean install but keep shares??? ... We have three servers running Windows 2000 and two running 2003. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.migration)
    • Upgrade from Server 2000
      ... You may have to look at this article too, to get FRS ... working (this is from Laura). ... >I want to do a Clean Install on my Windows 2000 servers. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)