Re: Client Drive Redirection Issues after Upgrade...Please help...
From: Patrick Rouse [MVP] (PatrickRouseMVP_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 08/07/04
- Previous message: James Crane: "Re: Client Drive Redirection Issues after Upgrade...Please help..."
- In reply to: James Crane: "Re: Client Drive Redirection Issues after Upgrade...Please help..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 15:13:01 -0700
You may either search groups.google.com for others who may have experienced
this problem, or open a PSS call with Microsoft to fix the problem.
As far as not wanting to do a clean install, it's wise to always have an
image level backup of your production terminal servers that you can revert to
in case a virus, disk failure or an application installation goes bad.
If you have roaming TS profiles the reinstall of a single TS + applications
should take no more than 4 hours, i.e. 1 hour for the OS + 3 hours to setup
whatever apps you use.
I have 4 production citrix metaframe servers and I can guinea-pig one of
them if I want to introduce a new application, since the other 3 machines can
sufficiently handle the entire user load. If something goes wrong I can take
the server offline and restore from backup or from an image.
If you're unsure of how some of your apps install on a TS then testing on a
lab computer is advised. You can even do a clean install on a different hard
disk, and set aside the current one in case you can't get the system
functioning in time for users to begin work.
"James Crane" wrote:
>
> I know it will work fine with a clean install.....that's what I'm
> trying to avoid though....
>
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 06:11:02 -0700, "Patrick Rouse [MVP]"
> <PatrickRouseMVP@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> >I have never seen this problem before and would suggest that you setup a test
> >box that is a clean install, not an upgrade from 2000 and see if yoou have
> >the same problem.
> >
> >Although the upgrade from 2000 to 2003 is farily painless, I've found that a
> >lot of people do this on single terminal server systems w/o testing first,
> >which is asking for trouble.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >"James Crane" wrote:
> >
> >> Also, I'm not the only person experiencing this. Here are some posts
> >> from the microsoft.public.windowsnt.terminalserver.client group :
> >>
> >> From: "KIWI" <john_hastie@nospamhotmail.com>
> >> Subject: Local drive mappings
> >> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:51:58 -0700
> >> Lines: 16
> >> X-Priority: 3
> >> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> >> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2149
> >> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2149
> >> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> >> Message-ID: <#rTtZWPdEHA.1644@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
> >> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsnt.terminalserver.client
> >> NNTP-Posting-Host: 207-232-119-188.ip.van.radiant.net 207.232.119.188
> >> Path: TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
> >> Xref: TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl
> >> microsoft.public.windowsnt.terminalserver.client:12844
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I have a couple of Windows 2003 Terminal Servers and even though the
> >> local
> >> resources disk drive option is selected the drives do not map when
> >> connected
> >> using the Win XP client. I do not have any issues on other W2K3
> >> Terminal
> >> Servers and the only thing different with these 2 is that they were
> >> upgraded
> >> machines initally running Windows 2000 TS.
> >>
> >> I'm thinking htere is some legacy piece or dll file that has remained
> >> from
> >> the Windows 2000 installation and rather than comletely rebuild the
> >> servers
> >> I'd like to know if anyone has any ideas on getting them to work
> >> correctly.
> >>
> >> TIA
> >> KIWI
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> From: jeffstrong@comcast.net (Jeff)
> >> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsnt.terminalserver.client
> >> Subject: Terminal server 2003 local drive access not available non
> >> admin
> >> Date: 31 Jul 2004 06:48:18 -0700
> >> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> >> Lines: 11
> >> Message-ID: <bf90e941.0407310548.5e77a57@posting.google.com>
> >> NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.83.123.216
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> >> X-Trace: posting.google.com 1091281698 3143 127.0.0.1 (31 Jul 2004
> >> 13:48:18 GMT)
> >> X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
> >> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 13:48:18 +0000 (UTC)
> >> Path:
> >> TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!proxad.net!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail
> >> Xref: TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl
> >> microsoft.public.windowsnt.terminalserver.client:12851
> >>
> >> Performed an upgrade from terminal server 2000 to 2003. This is a
> >> member server of a domain. Added the appropriate users to the local
> >> Remote Desktop Users group to allow them login. The users can login,
> >> but to not see local redirected drives even if checking the option in
> >> the RDP client. However, if a user is a member of the terminal
> >> server's local administrator's group, they do see the drives. I
> >> obviously can't leave everyone a member of the local computer's admin
> >> group. I've done a new install of a 2003 terminal server before and
> >> didn't have this issue. Is there a security setting that I'm missing
> >> somwhere? Permission compatibility is set to Relaxed Security. Any
> >> help is much appreciated.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, 05 Aug 2004 07:03:14 -0400, James Crane
> >> <administrator@*nospam*westlawngraphic.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Thanks for the response Patrick.....
> >> >
> >> >Why does moving them to the local Administrators group on the terminal
> >> >server fix the problem without changing any other settings on their
> >> >user account then? The users are not even in an OU in Active
> >> >Directory, they are in the ordinary Users container. If it was a GPO
> >> >that was causing this, moving them to the local Adminstrators group on
> >> >the terminal server should have no effect, since a GPO overrides any
> >> >local policies.... This is not a client issue either. Connecting
> >> >from the same machine as the same user maps the drives when they are
> >> >members of the local Administrators group on the terminal server. As
> >> >soon as you remove them from the Administrators group and place them
> >> >in the Remote Desktop Users group, the drives stop redirecting. It
> >> >definitely seems like a permissions problem at the terminal server
> >> >itself....almost like the upgrade failed to grant the proper
> >> >permissions to the Remote Desktop Users group.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 21:25:01 -0700, "Patrick Rouse [MVP]"
> >> ><PatrickRouseMVP@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>This can be disabled in the user's account, at the server level or via GPO.
> >> >>Make sure the end user is using Remote Desktop Client 5.1 or higher and that
> >> >>they have disk drives checked in the local devices section.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>"James Crane" wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> After upgrading a Windows 2000 Server terminal server to Windows
> >> >>> Server 2003, only local Administrators of the terminal server can have
> >> >>> their local drives redirect in their RDP session. If I add the users
> >> >>> to the local Administrators groups, their drives will redirect also.
> >> >>> Obviously, I don't want to give all my domain users full
> >> >>> administrative privileges of the terminal server..... Is their a
> >> >>> local policy that I need to configure to allow Remote Desktop Users
> >> >>> the ability to redirect their local drives??
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.....
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Jim
> >> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
- Previous message: James Crane: "Re: Client Drive Redirection Issues after Upgrade...Please help..."
- In reply to: James Crane: "Re: Client Drive Redirection Issues after Upgrade...Please help..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|