Re: Using sysprep on Win2K to unplanned different hardware

From: Michael Leone (mleone_at_contributionship.com)
Date: 08/27/04


Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 14:22:52 -0400


"Dennis Calhoun" <dcalhoun@blomand.net> wrote in message
news:bdmti014rg82360evle6odapedv48kd0pg@4ax.com...
>
> If you can be assured that all involved systems with have the same
> HAL, such as they will all be ACPI uniprocessor PC type systems, get
> sysprep 1.1 from the MS website and extract it. In the cab you will
> find a DOCS folder and in it are two files that contain ALL of the IDE
> and SCSI entries that Win 2000 includes. The files are idepnpids.txt
> and scsipnpids.txt.
>
> You can add the entire list of IDE and SCSI mass storage device
> entries to the [SysprepMassStorage] section of your Sysprep.inf file.
> When you boot up a machine that has all of these, so long as the
> machine contains a device that is in the list, it *will* be properly
> assigned the necessary driver and will boot up ok.

The hard disks in the replacement machines will be connected to RAID
controllers that are (almost certainly) not in that list. That list includes
no Dell PERC RAID controllers, that I saw, and these machines will
(probably, altho not defintely) be Dell machines, using Dell RAID
controllers (altho I can not guarantee ahead of time with model RAID
controller). So adding those drivers entries you speak of to the sysprep.inf
wouldn't help me, in that sitution, would it?

> Also, in your distro you need to add the cmdlines.txt file to your
> $OEM$ folder and in that file have the *first* command be
> C:\Sysprep\Sysprep -clean
> assuming you have Sysprep located in C:\Sysprep [adjust to fit your
> location]

My sysprep.inf file has all the IDE drivers listed (altho I also had to add
a registry file with those same drivers, according to an MS KB article I
found). This works for all machines I've tried, that are on machines with no
SCSI controllers. Everytime I add the SCSI list to the sysprep.inf file
(making no other changes), and re-do sysprep, it blue screens with "07B". If
I remove the SCSI entries from the list, and leave just the IDE, it boots
fine. Every time, on multiple models of hardware.

Never boots with both IDE and SCSI controllers listed. I even downloaded a
sysprep.inf from the Net, from the author of the Windows 2000 Deployment
Guide book ... still blue-screens. Every time, and on multiple models (IDE
only, IDE and SCSI drives attached).



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Difference between IDE and SCSI ??
    ... Unlike IDE, SCSI was more geared towards PERIPHERAL integration into computer systems. ... Scanners, Network Interfaces, Drives, Tape backups, the list goes on and on becauce SCSI that's what SCSI was designed for. ... I've had machines with multiple SCSI host adaptors (they aren't "controllers" because the peripherals control themselves. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Windows recognizing drives as SCSI??!?!!!
    ... Windows XP will treat all add-on drive controllers as ... If you were to add a standard IDE PCI controller to any ... all drives will be shown as SCSI. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.hardware)
  • Re: Power PC 7248 where to start ? "RS6000 WKS"
    ... > NCR810 SCSI (but ide too) ... There are SCSI-only 7248 machines, ... OS/2 PPC Edition should run on these. ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware)
  • Re: OT: SCSI better than IDE?
    ... Em Qua, 1997-01-01 Ã s 10:09, A.L.Meyers escreveu: ... >> IDE or SCSI. ... It's just the controllers which are different. ... So are you saying that SCSI hard drives are simply ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Newbie: Trying to add new SCSI Maxtor Atlas 15k drive to IBM Intellistation M Pro
    ... I've got some IDE and SCSI drives to fit and have fitted enough IDE ... However some of our machines are SCSI ...
    (comp.periphs.scsi)