Re: Boot.ini Question


"Phydeaux682000@xxxxxxxxx" <chrispedersen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1143162962.138282.312450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I suspect that you are right.

[boot loader]
timeout=30
default=multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partion(1)\WINNT
[operating systems]
multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partion(1)\WINNT="Microsoft Windows 2000 Server"
/fastdetect
C:\="Microsoft Windows"

And of course, c is NTFS.


Getting back to your original post: If you want to revitalise
Win98 in order to run your CD burner then you could to so
but it would be a major effort. Much easier to reload the
CD burning software under Win2000.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Does Microsoft lie about the Linux features?
    ... about 5 hotfixes a week from my distro makers to fix silly things like my ... protect against buffer overflows) problems in Windows 2003 Server and .NET. ... > this was stupid because DOS couldn't read NTFS. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Does Microsoft lie about the Linux features?
    ... about 5 hotfixes a week from my distro makers to fix silly things like my ... protect against buffer overflows) problems in Windows 2003 Server and .NET. ... > this was stupid because DOS couldn't read NTFS. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Does Microsoft lie about the Linux features?
    ... about 5 hotfixes a week from my distro makers to fix silly things like my ... protect against buffer overflows) problems in Windows 2003 Server and .NET. ... > this was stupid because DOS couldn't read NTFS. ...
    (comp.os.linux.hardware)
  • Re: Does Microsoft lie about the Linux features?
    ... > Have you looked around in Windows Update lately? ... >>The reason for that is still legacy app compatibility, not DOS ... this was stupid because DOS couldn't read NTFS. ... >>That's because that software only ships with server versions of the OS. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Does Microsoft lie about the Linux features?
    ... > Have you looked around in Windows Update lately? ... >>The reason for that is still legacy app compatibility, not DOS ... this was stupid because DOS couldn't read NTFS. ... >>That's because that software only ships with server versions of the OS. ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
Loading