Re: Win 200 SP4 Boot time

From: Dan Seur (click_at_casta.net)
Date: 12/09/04

  • Next message: humans: "RE: Win2k setup resume problem"
    Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 15:50:55 -0500
    
    

    You're welcome, and good luck. Funny how time slows down when you're
    waiting for something good to happen, and speeds up when you're waiting
    for something bad!

    Jimbo

    > Thanks for the input Dan,
    >
    > I had already made a fixed size page file of the Windows reccomended size
    > (376 Mb) on separate partition. I try increasing it.
    >
    > I have heard rumours in the past that a very larger size cab cause problems
    > but not sure whether this was in connection with Win 2k or not - I also
    > seem to recall that it affected only those with 512 Mb Ram.
    >
    > As for the security software - I think you may well be right. There does
    > appear to be some fairly sustained and intensive disk activity even when
    > desktop and system tray is fully loaded. I'll have a looksee in task manager
    > as you suggested
    >
    > Regards and thanks again
    >
    >
    >
    > "Dan Seur" <click@casta.net> wrote in message
    > news:u5ZVVVi3EHA.1264@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
    >
    >>That's not a very fast machine, especially with only 256MB RAM, so it may
    >>not ever be a quick boot with W2k. Disabling event log probably won't do
    >>anything at all good, and it's not a good idea for other reasons.
    >>
    >>You might try making the pagefile a good bit larger, and if possible
    >>putting it on a hard drive other than the one containing the system
    >>itself.
    >>
    >>I suspect the security program is the core problem. Such programs (I'm not
    >>a Norton user, so take this as speculation in that case) often start
    >>scanning files immediately as they're being loaded, and that scanning uses
    >>a large percentage of the CPU. You might be able to see direct evidence of
    >>this if you're able to launch Task Manager right away, and look at
    >>Processes. Clicking on the CPU heading in that window will arrange the
    >>executing processes by CPU cycles used.
    >>
    >>Jimbo
    >>
    >>
    >>>I have been asked by a friend to find out what would be a reasonable time
    >>>for Win 200 SP4 to boot up.
    >>>The machine is has a Celeron 633 Mhz cpu with 256 Mb Ram.
    >>>Since installing Norton 2005 Internet security the boot up time is approx
    >>>4 mins
    >>>The disk has been defragged and normal housekeeping carried out.
    >>>
    >>>Is 4 mins reasonable ?
    >>>Would disabling the event log (if it were possible)etc speed things up ?
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>Regards & TIA
    >>>
    >>>
    >>
    >
    >


  • Next message: humans: "RE: Win2k setup resume problem"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Win 200 SP4 Boot time
      ... Disabling event log probably ... I suspect the security program is the core problem. ... Clicking on the CPU heading in that window will ... arrange the executing processes by CPU cycles used. ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.setup)
    • Re: Non-intel benchmarks on Conroe vs AMDs AM2 FX62
      ... Are you advocating waiting, for some future "shake-out" or price ... new and promising CPU? ... much better reason to wait than are future price reductions. ...
      (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips)
    • Re: f9: question on load average
      ... i.e. those that could do something if they had the cpu. ... are waiting for something to happen, e.g. I/O to complete, can't use the ... Here's a more technical explanation of how the LA is calculated: ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: On the necessity of threads having sleep time...
      ... thread will consume all CPU time for the process and will not allow ... one thread that reads from client connections when a client has a ... There are also some rare situations where you wouldn't want any waiting or ... Have the thread monitor a variable that ...
      (comp.programming.threads)
    • Re: SQL tuning nightmare - db file sequential reads
      ... Statspack includes 'CPU used ... by this session' but it should really also include 'consistent gets', ... comes down to SQL tuning. ... session is waiting i.e. not on CPU, ...
      (comp.databases.oracle.server)