Re: Win2k Upgrade Requirements
From: Magnusfarce (magnusfarce3_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 04/14/04
- Previous message: pbasham: "Windows 2000 Server Logon Problem"
- In reply to: Dave Patrick: "Re: Win2k Upgrade Requirements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 00:10:33 GMT
I see your point and would consider that a problem if I were going to
operate the computer using Win98, but using it merely as a stepping stone to
a newer OS for which I'm paying MS seems like a pretty small issue. I could
probably find a way to live with myself.
Hypothetically, of course. ;-)
- Magnusfarce
"Dave Patrick" <mail@NoSpam.DSPatrick.com> wrote in message
news:e4zpg4ZIEHA.2720@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> I really wouldn't worry about it. But wouldn't that be the same effect as
> installing one copy of Win98 (or whatever) on multiple pc's for which you
> only have on license?
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.
> Microsoft Certified Professional
> Microsoft MVP [Windows]
> http://www.microsoft.com/protect
>
>
> "Magnusfarce" wrote:
> | Re your answer to the last question, in what way would "not legally"
> | manifest itself?
>
>
- Previous message: pbasham: "Windows 2000 Server Logon Problem"
- In reply to: Dave Patrick: "Re: Win2k Upgrade Requirements"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|