Re: Best solution to segment subnets
- From: Vince <Vince@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 10:44:01 -0800
Hi Kurt,
Thanks again...
switches are uplinked to each other. This scenario will isolate the subnets?
i have a no clear idea of this scenario, maybe so nat routers are confusing
me. I didn't know about so cheap soho routers, they are just nat routers? no
adsl?
subnet 1 and subnet 2 are two room (telematic networks to kids can practise)
in the second floor, i need isolate them from subnet 3 and from each other.
Three subnets need internet.
Regards Kust and sorry i'm a bit confuse.
"Kurt" wrote:
Vince wrote:.
Hi Kurt,
thanks for the quick anwser. Sorry, here is more information.
The problem is that swicthes are not managed, so they don't support Vlan's.
Foundry Networks 2402CF switches awasome models, i didn't know them. But now
we can't afford this cost.
There are three subnets and y don't know if it's posible to segment them
with the nowdays network layout. I have this:
subnet 1
|
switch
|
[Central Rack]
switch--------------------- subnet 3
ADSL router
Windows Server 2003 2 NICs
[Central Rack]
|
switch
|
subnet 2
Router ADSL 192.168.0.1 there is no way to manage this router because my ISP
installed it. I think what i want to do it's no posible, ins't it?
i am wondering if add to my windows 2003 server (DC) RRAS services and
segment this 3 subnets. Of course Vlan's it's the way to go but not posible
nowdays, no managed switches installed.
Sorry about my english.
Regards,
Vince.
Your English is fine.
Since you can't manage your ISPs router, the simplest thing to do is add
a router for two subnets (R1 and R2 below). One subnet should be the
same as the ISPs router. If that's not possible, just add another router
for subnet 3 exactly the same as for subnets 1 and 2 below. Note that
these are just cheap SOHO routers that perform NAT. Any $39.95 SOHO
router should do the trick.
subnet 1 192.168.1.x
192.168.1.1 |
R1---------------switch
192.168.0.2 |
| [Central Rack]
ADSL router----------switch-------------------- subnet 3 (192.168.0.x)
192.168.0.1 Windows Server 2003 2 NICs
| [Central Rack]
192.168.0.3 |
R2---------------switch
192.168.2.1 |
subnet 2 192.168.2.x
That'll give you Internet for the other two subnets. I'm assuming the
switches aren't uplinked to each other, but even if they were it would
still work. You'll have a "double-NAT" situation which would give you
problems if you're running L2TP VPNs from subnets 1 or two. Otherwise,
for just general internet stuff (email surfing, etc) it'll work just
fine. You should be able to just configure your extra routers WAN ports
to be DHCP and get those addresses form your ISP's router.
....kurt
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Best solution to segment subnets
- From: Kurt
- Re: Best solution to segment subnets
- References:
- Re: Best solution to segment subnets
- From: Kurt
- Re: Best solution to segment subnets
- From: Vince
- Re: Best solution to segment subnets
- From: Kurt
- Re: Best solution to segment subnets
- Prev by Date: Re: Best solution to segment subnets
- Next by Date: Re: Best solution to segment subnets
- Previous by thread: Re: Best solution to segment subnets
- Next by thread: Re: Best solution to segment subnets
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|