Re: win2000as routing
- From: Dejan Rodiger <dejan.wirusrodiger@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 07:51:49 +0100
Bill Grant said the following on 03.03.2006 02:01:
If you are trying to use this method to route between the two sites, you
are using the wrong approach. You do not need to configure routing manually.
Manual config fails because the interface does not exist until you make the
connection.
The correct procedure is to use RRAS and set up a demand-dial interface
to act as the connection point, not the default dialup interface. You link
the subnet route to this interface (using the new static route wizard). When
the remote site dials in, it connects to the demand-dial interface and the
subnet route becomes active. (It is stored in the registry). When the
connection is broken, the extra route is removed from the routing table.
Check the entries in help on lan to lan or router to router connections.
Thank you Bill for your response, I will look at RRAS. I didn't want to
complicate with RRAS, since it was working OK (until this).
--
Dejan Rodiger - PGP ID 0xAC8722DC
Delete wirus from e-mail address
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: win2000as routing
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: win2000as routing
- References:
- win2000as routing
- From: Dejan Rodiger
- Re: win2000as routing
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: win2000as routing
- From: Bill Grant
- win2000as routing
- Prev by Date: VPN and NAT routing packets through public adapter
- Next by Date: Re: 2 Questions on RRAS routing
- Previous by thread: Re: win2000as routing
- Next by thread: Re: win2000as routing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading