Re: Frustrating VPN Problem
- From: "." <noemails@please>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:25:47 -0500
Thanks for the note. Yes, this is a really, really big problem for companies
that did their network installations many years ago and took all of the
defaults. Their world was fine as long as the outside world was out of the
picture. :-)
Take care,
Ray
<CTSI.2Robs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1136938245.983011.45440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Oh, for the love of... It's that freaking easy? You've got to be
> kidding me. Sure enough, it works now. Thanks, Ray, I really
> appreciate the info. I just called my partner and asked him to change
> his home addressing also to verify that it works for his Mac now, but
> I've got a pretty good feeling about it.
>
> It's just the two of us, so it's really pretty simple for us to change
> our respective home IP addressing schemes. The real problem is that
> we'll be going to clients, and we have no way to control, or often even
> know, what addressing scheme they have running until we get there. The
> best I can figure is we'll need to use a private address scheme that's
> so far out of the norm that most people won't have it; something really
> off the wall.
>
> But hey, at least at home I can connect now, and that's a real plus!
>
> Thanks again, Ray.
>
.
- References:
- Frustrating VPN Problem
- From: CTSI . 2Robs
- Re: Frustrating VPN Problem
- From: CTSI.2Robs@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Frustrating VPN Problem
- From: CTSI.2Robs@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Frustrating VPN Problem
- From: .
- Frustrating VPN Problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Frustrating VPN Problem
- Next by Date: printing to remote printer
- Previous by thread: Re: Frustrating VPN Problem
- Next by thread: Re: Frustrating VPN Problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading