Re: VPN with RRAS behind a cisco 1760 router
- From: "Josh" <Josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:31:41 -0800
Hi Bill,
I am trying to connect to the server from my house via VPN and I am getting
an error 678. I am able to connect via VNC to the server fine and adjust
settings. I have RRAS enabled with just Remote Access on custom checked.
"Bill Grant" wrote:
> OK. You tried it. What happened? Can you connect from a LAN machine? If
> you can connect locally but not remotely, what error messages do you get?
>
> Josh wrote:
> > Hey Bill,
> >
> > I tried that and kept that 2nd NIC disabled, and only turned on Remote
> > Access and did not use packet filters. I read about the packet
> > filters and how they work so I made sure not to enable them.
> >
> > "Bill Grant" wrote:
> >
> >> You don't need two NICs if you are behind a router. I suspect
> >> that you used the wrong option in the wizard and have installed
> >> packet filters on your only NIC.
> >>
> >> All you need to do in RRAS is enable remote access. If the Cisco
> >> is redirecting everything from one public IP to this server, VPN
> >> should just work. Test it by connecting to the server from another
> >> LAN machine using the server's private IP.
> >>
> >> Josh wrote:
> >>> Hi Computer Friends Alike,
> >>>
> >>> I have a problem that hopefully you guys can help with. Here goes.
> >>> I just had a T1 installed at my dads office by bellsouth and they
> >>> gave us a managed Cisco 1760 router that they do all the port
> >>> forwarding and NAT configurations and dont give me any access to.
> >>> We have a Windows 2003 server that is our domain controller and an
> >>> ip of 192.168.1.20 and RRAS is not enabled at the moment (i did
> >>> enable it and it messed up everything). Also the server has 2 NIC's
> >>> and i have one disabled and the other is enabled.
> >>>
> >>> Bellsouth gave us 32 IP's with the T1 and on my request they did a
> >>> NAT for the public IP I chose to give the server (70.119.*.*) to the
> >>> 192.168.1.20 so we could access our website and mail. Now,
> >>> everything works without the RRAS etc., but when I go to install the
> >>> RRAS so my dad can map a server drive to his PC at his house to
> >>> work, everything shuts down. Their office network just flops
> >>> basically.
> >>>
> >>> Now, i know MS wants you to use the server as a router also when
> >>> using the RRAS and use its NAT but that seems to me like it is using
> >>> 2 routers which creates the problem. You are hitting the Cisco 1760
> >>> which forwards the NAT to the server, then the server has RRAS on
> >>> which makes it like another router. I have setup RRAS before with
> >>> no problem and used the VPN feature before we had the T1 and this
> >>> new Cisco on our LAN. How can I get this setup to where the RRAS is
> >>> installed so my dad can connect via VPN without using the NAT and
> >>> creating this other issue of the users not having access to the
> >>> internet etc. I would prefer not to enable both NICs considering
> >>> our server is behind a pretty good router. I hope I am making
> >>> sense and thanks for any help on this issue.
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VPN with RRAS behind a cisco 1760 router
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: VPN with RRAS behind a cisco 1760 router
- References:
- Re: VPN with RRAS behind a cisco 1760 router
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: VPN with RRAS behind a cisco 1760 router
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: VPN with RRAS behind a cisco 1760 router
- Prev by Date: Re: Setting up a VPN Gateway on a Win2K server
- Next by Date: Re: VPN with RRAS behind a cisco 1760 router
- Previous by thread: Re: VPN with RRAS behind a cisco 1760 router
- Next by thread: Re: VPN with RRAS behind a cisco 1760 router
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
