Re: Connecting 2 networks via Win 2003 server
- From: Mart <mvinfotech@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 09:07:34 +0100
On Fri, 13 May 2005 10:34:36 +1000, "Bill Grant"
<not.available@online> wrote:
If I place a static route on the PC1, I am able to ping PC1 from PC2.
However I am unable to ping PC2 from PC1. I'm getting very confused!
The fact that this does not happen when I do not have the static route
on the PC, but in the firewall, does this mean that ICMP redirect
packets are not being allowed through?
> It shouldn't really matter. When a client in 192.168.254 tries to access
>a target machine in 192.168.253 , the packet will go to its default router
>(the PIX at 192.168.254.252) . The PIX will redirect the packet to
>192.168.254.250 (the RRAS router) because of the static route you added.
>After this, it should send an ICMP redirect to the sender to inform it of
>the correct address to use in future. But the packet should have already
>gone.
>
> What happens if you put the static route directly on the client? That
>should bypass the PIX altogether. The client should send the packet to the
>RRAS router itself.
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Connecting 2 networks via Win 2003 server
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: Connecting 2 networks via Win 2003 server
- References:
- Connecting 2 networks via Win 2003 server
- From: Mart
- Re: Connecting 2 networks via Win 2003 server
- From: Robert L [MS-MVP]
- Re: Connecting 2 networks via Win 2003 server
- From: Mart
- Re: Connecting 2 networks via Win 2003 server
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: Connecting 2 networks via Win 2003 server
- From: Mart
- Re: Connecting 2 networks via Win 2003 server
- From: Bill Grant
- Connecting 2 networks via Win 2003 server
- Prev by Date: Re: Connecting 2 networks via Win 2003 server
- Next by Date: Problem connecting to VPN with windows xp sp 2
- Previous by thread: Re: Connecting 2 networks via Win 2003 server
- Next by thread: Re: Connecting 2 networks via Win 2003 server
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading