|
if you want to more security and add windows 2000
with NAT, that should work, but more router or NAT more difficult to
setup.
Hi
Robert-
Thank you, I guest... here's my question in concerned. NAT is
enabled on the
Server, but when I go to a workstation that is still
connected to the hub, it
doesn't see the internet, only the
server.
So, being that I have the router install with the modem, and
now behind a
firewall, for security, which is important. Now, being that
NAT is enabled,
should I unplugged the two workstations from the hub and
attach them directly
to the router, will I (they) be able to see the
internet and the server like
they did before?
Or, is there
something on the workstation that needs to be configured?
Also, I set
everything up as DHCP, with a perferred DNS of 151.164.1.8 &
206.13.28.12> Which the workstation being DHCP, and NAT being enabled
on the
Windwos 2000 Server, shouldn't it work automatically... or do I
have need to
do as you said connect to the router and will it work like it
should seeing
all the internet and the server.
Also, one last
note... which article on the page you said is what I would
need to review
to hlep me on this?
Thanks!
D.M.
"Robert L [MS-MVP]"
wrote:
> depend on which package they ordered. if it comes with
modem, it is better to have a hardware router. Or setup the server as router
with NAT. If it comes with router, all computers can connect to the router.
For more and other information, go to http://howtonetworking.com.
>
> Don't send e-mail or reply to me except you need consulting services.
Posting on MS newsgroup will benefit all readers and you may get more
help.
>
> Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
> How to Setup
Windows, Network, Remote Access on http://www.HowToNetworking.com
>
Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net
> This
posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties.
> I recommend Brinkster
for web hosting!
>
> "tlc_13200@xxxxxxxxxxx" <tlc13200hotmailcom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in message news:C6BF3AB5-C4FF-4A2E-9AEA-61FC1F5B21D0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx...
>
Hi-
>
> I have a customer who used to have DSL way
back when, about three (3) years
> ago, when internet was
expensive. Now, they ordered and got Yahoo.DSL.
>
>
The Windows 2000 Server was configured at one time for NAT, but not sure now
> what it is until I look tomorrow.
>
> My question is: which method of internet connectivity is
best for them?
> Should we use a router for security and
easy setup to make all their
> computers access the
internet and the server at the same time?
>
> If NAT
is still working, or active, will that be the best solution?
> Although, I haven't setup internet connectivity in a long
while going this
> route, so what is the best way to go
about it?
>
> Please contact me once you have a
suggestion, I am seeing them tomorrow.
>
>
D
|
