Re: Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- From: "Linh" <Linh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 17:15:02 -0800
To be honest that doesnt make sense since you can run the VPN from one
interface... Bill what is your take =)
"Scott Harding" wrote:
> You need two interfaces on 2 different subnets for this to work.
>
> --
> Scott Harding
> MCSE, MCSA, A+, Network+
> Microsoft MVP - Windows NT Server
>
> "Linh" <Linh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:AA4D7CDC-F89E-4CB0-910B-0A2C94C356A0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > I've actually tired with only one interface... I'll give it a try again
> > but
> > it wasnt working before... =/
> >
> > Even before when I was using one interface the only way I could connect to
> > specific servers was by clicking on NAT/Basic Filtering and then click on
> > the
> > interface ...under there you will see a Services and Ports ... I select a
> > service or add a port and the ip I want to access and the next time I
> > connect
> > to the vpn I can access the machine.
> >
> > I'd like to access all machines without having to do that...
> >
> > thanks for all the help=) hopefully I can figure this out...
> >
> > "Bill Grant" wrote:
> >
> >> I don't understand the last bit. How can you "allow routing on port
> >> 22"!
> >> IP routing works on IP addresses. Port forwarding/filtering is a
> >> completely
> >> different thing.
> >>
> >> In addition, why does the server have two interfaces in the same IP
> >> subnet? RRAS does funny things when this is the case. You only need two
> >> interfaces if the server if is directly connected to the Internet (ie one
> >> public and one private). If you are behind a router, the router is the
> >> public interface.
> >>
> >> I would give the server just one NIC and one IP address. Forward tcp
> >> port 1723 from the router to this IP address. This extends the VPN
> >> connection to the server. All VPN traffic will be encrypted and
> >> encapsulated
> >> between the remote client and the server. After it reaches the server it
> >> will be decrypted and forwarded to the LAN with its private address.
> >>
> >> "Linh" <Linh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:C435BAD7-EC48-42E6-B7D6-172AFA6B735E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >I have two interfaces on the windows2k3 machine. The first interface is
> >> > 192.168.1.181 and the second is .182 (yes they are on the same router)
> >> >
> >> > I'm connecting to the VPN from an external site (some where over the
> >> > internet)
> >> > Yes i'm connected to the vpn! The external machine gets an internal ip
> >> > address and its able to ping the interfaces on the VPN server. Not
> >> > only
> >> > that
> >> > if I allow routing to 192.168.1.69 on port 22 I can ssh to that machine
> >> > from
> >> > the external computer. Yes the machine is on the VPN
> >> >
> >> > Its not an "internet" issue
> >> >
> >> > "Bill Grant" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Are you sure you are actually connecting by VPN? The symptoms you
> >> >> describe fit the case when you are connecting directly through the
> >> >> Internet!
> >> >>
> >> >> If you connect by VPN, your client should be receiving a private
> >> >> IP
> >> >> address. Its connection to the server should be through the "virtual"
> >> >> interface of the server. Any port forwarding settings on the server
> >> >> should
> >> >> have no effect on this connection. The VPN traffic comes through the
> >> >> "public" interface encrypted and encapsulated and is not seen by that
> >> >> interface.
> >> >>
> >> >> "Linh" <Linh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> >> news:996258F3-F8E4-4813-906B-1099206896F3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> > I'm sorry I guess I was unclear. I'm unable to access the machines
> >> >> > on
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > private interface. I'm unable to ping them. However if I forward
> >> >> > ports
> >> >> > to
> >> >> > these server then i'm able to connect to 192.168.1.machinIP
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I would like open access to all machines...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > thanks!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Scott Harding" wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> This is typically because of misconfigured DNS/WINS settings. They
> >> >> >> won't
> >> >> >> be
> >> >> >> able to browse through Network neighborhood but should be able to
> >> >> >> access
> >> >> >> resources by name.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> Scott Harding
> >> >> >> MCSE, MCSA, A+, Network+
> >> >> >> Microsoft MVP - Windows NT Server
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> "Linh" <Linh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> >> >> news:174AF13F-9D3A-40E2-A292-B3E6F8BC1A73@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> >> >I have users successfully connecting to the VPN through my public,
> >> >> >> >they
> >> >> >> >are
> >> >> >> > able to access both interfaces on the VPN server however they are
> >> >> >> > unable
> >> >> >> > to
> >> >> >> > access any of the machines on the private network. Within the
> >> >> >> > Windows
> >> >> >> > 2003
> >> >> >> > VPN setup I was able to forward ports to specific machines and
> >> >> >> > have
> >> >> >> > the
> >> >> >> > VPN
> >> >> >> > users access that but ideally I would like to give the users
> >> >> >> > unrestricted
> >> >> >> > access to the private network. Is this possible if so how?
> >> >> >> > Private
> >> >> >> > network
> >> >> >> > is 192.168.1.0/24
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- References:
- Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- From: Linh
- Re: Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- From: Scott Harding
- Re: Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- From: Linh
- Re: Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- From: Linh
- Re: Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- From: Bill Grant
- Re: Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- From: Linh
- Re: Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- From: Scott Harding
- Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- Prev by Date: Re: Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- Next by Date: Re: windows server 2003 required for L2TP VPN?
- Previous by thread: Re: Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- Next by thread: Re: Unable to access private network from the VPN (NAT)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading