Re: NAT + FTP = troubles?
From: NetEng (cclark_at_trailersaver.com)
Date: 05/18/04
- Next message: Rick Csucsai: "Re: RRAS-VPN-Static Pool-Default Gateway assignment"
- Previous message: Rick Csucsai: "Re: RRAS-VPN-Static Pool-Default Gateway assignment"
- In reply to: Massimo: "Re: NAT + FTP = troubles?"
- Next in thread: Massimo: "Re: NAT + FTP = troubles?"
- Reply: Massimo: "Re: NAT + FTP = troubles?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 08:20:02 -0500
from the outside, can you telnet to port 21? This will tell us if we can get
to the box OK. Let's see if we can get a connection first and then we'll see
if it's an FTP problem or not.
"Massimo" <barone@mclink.it> wrote in message
news:uJHd1fFPEHA.3096@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> "NetEng" <cclark@trailersaver.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:uwK5G7EPEHA.268@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl
>
> > Is there anything in your event logs? FTP logs?
>
> Nothing.
>
> Massimo
>
- Next message: Rick Csucsai: "Re: RRAS-VPN-Static Pool-Default Gateway assignment"
- Previous message: Rick Csucsai: "Re: RRAS-VPN-Static Pool-Default Gateway assignment"
- In reply to: Massimo: "Re: NAT + FTP = troubles?"
- Next in thread: Massimo: "Re: NAT + FTP = troubles?"
- Reply: Massimo: "Re: NAT + FTP = troubles?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|