Re: VPN and static routes re-visited
From: Bill Grant (not.available_at_online)
Date: 05/14/04
- Next message: Bill Grant: "Re: daft question"
- Previous message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: RAS Policy on Win 2000 AD"
- In reply to: Patrick: "VPN and static routes re-visited"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: VPN and static routes re-visited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 10:35:59 +1000
If you have a lot of remote users in this situation, consider using CMAK
(connection manager admin kit). You can then configure the client settings
for remote users at the server, and have them downloaded to the client.
"Patrick" <pmcgilvray@xxcrescentpark.com> wrote in message
news:OyEgZZPOEHA.624@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> I've read through a lot of threads that deal with this, but still don't
see
> a clear solution for MY particular situation, so here goes:
>
> We have remote VPN users who work all day from home. They all have
> high-speed Internet at home and connect to our RRAS servers using PPTP VPN
> connections. They need to access resources on other subnets. If they
check
> "Use default gateway on remote network", this works fine. BUT, they can
no
> longer access the Internet. This is a problem.
>
> I have setup static routes in DHCP using the static route option, and that
> works great for internal LAN users, but the routes don't get added to the
> VPN client's routing tables. Is this by design?
>
> I've also tried adding persistent routes to the clients which again works
> fine from inside the LAN, but not for remote VPN clients.
>
> --
> Patrick (MCP)
> pmcgilvray@xxcrescentpark.com (remove xx)
>
>
- Next message: Bill Grant: "Re: daft question"
- Previous message: Steven L Umbach: "Re: RAS Policy on Win 2000 AD"
- In reply to: Patrick: "VPN and static routes re-visited"
- Next in thread: Mike: "Re: VPN and static routes re-visited"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
