Re: dymanic route table problem

Thanks guys, I believe that is where the problem lies as well.
The redirect has been mentioned by another person as well and that is surely what it seems like it is happening.

"Kurt" <lorentzenkurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:12ham4vnk1cb6f1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I agree 100% with Phillip. If it only happens in segments where the default
gateway is pointed at the PIX, the PIX is responsible - it may not be doing
anything wrong based on it's configuration - but it is almost surely the
source of the information. Windows will not learn routes from another
router's routing table (unless a routing protocol is running on both), but
it will learn direct routes to hosts via an ip redirect.

..kurt

"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:ujF3nCq3GHA.5092@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Brian E" <dirwolf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Ot6dq7d3GHA.4748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Would you happen to have any references on how 2000/2003 discovers routes
> on boot,
>
> I'm not aware that such a mechanism even exists,...in fact I don't think
> such a thing does exist. The routing table is built at bootime based on
> the TCP/IP config of the Interfaces, so it is effectively *static* and not
> "learned", which is why I asked earlier if there were additional IP#s
> configured that might have been forgotten about.
>
> You need to be looking at the PIX and any other router that "touches" that
> segment. If you don't have access to those things, find someone who does
> and dump this in their lap.
>
>> I have a feeling this is something learned, something like spanning tree.
>
> Spanning Tree is Layer2 and only effects the Switch Fabric. In the end
> all it really does is detect rudundant Switch Pathes and shuts down the
> slower one and holds it in reserve in case the primary one goes
> down,...then it brings up the reservered one. That is all it does,..it is
> Layer2 and only functions within a single subnet. Routing Tables in the
> OS are Layer3, so there is really no relationship at all,..they aren't
> even aware of each other.
>
> --
> Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
> www.wandtv.com
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: dymanic route table problem
    ... It is a type of redirect, cisco may call it some thing else. ... >gateway is pointed at the PIX, the PIX is responsible - it may not be doing ... >router's routing table (unless a routing protocol is running on both), ... >it will learn direct routes to hosts via an ip redirect. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)
  • Re: Again: Pix VPN & Routing
    ... Routing of traffic on the pix adheres to the routes found in the routing ... So if you'd like traffic to certain networks to go out the inside interface, ...
    (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
  • Re: routing problem
    ... I even don't know ipfilter yet. ... it to static and cloned routing, but taking it out of the mix might help ... I tried to set static routes. ... Possibly just a little confusion re how freebsd routing tables are ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • RE: Routes being automatically added to WK3 server routing table
    ... "Routing and Remote Access" enabled on this server. ... If the unexpected routes are not added manually, as you mentioned, we can ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)
  • Re: Server 2003 RRAS Routing
    ... You simply enable IP routing in RRAS. ... That just enables the router. ... how do I enable Internet routing through RRAS? ... However, when any user attempts to connect to the VPN, they only get routes for the subnet local to the RRAS server. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)