Re: dymanic route table problem
- From: "Brian E" <dirwolf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:48:42 -0400
Phillip
I do appreciate your help, however, I have gone over all of that on the
system.
There are no other network devices on these systems.
There are no routing protocols being broadcasted by the pix firewall,
this was verified by the network team today, it is all static entries, no
route learning by the device, that kind of control is needed.
There are no virtual adapters or modems.
there are no extra ip addresses or gateways.
To even complicate this I have found that 20 different systems that live
on this one vlan with this pix firewall all have at least one entry in the
route table that should not be there.
So, the basic question is how the OS truly adds an ip route to the table
when it has no interface to that subnet.
This is also an enterprise class network, it is not a workgroup with
hubs.
thanks,
"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:%232aLAEQ3GHA.3944@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Please switch to "plain text" format)
The routing table may also do that if you have addional IP#s assigned to
Nics in the Advanced section of the TCP/IP Propterties that you may have
forgotten are there.
Virtual Adapters like modems, VPN, and some other types will also create
entries in the table for themselves. Anything that shows up as an Adapter
when you run "IPConfig /All" can potentially do this.
Routing Protocols exchange routing tables between devices,...you can not get
a route dynamically unless there is another device on the LAN with a routing
table that it wants to "pass on",...the routing protocols do not create that
stuff on their own. Enabling routing protocols on a single device sitting
on the LAN by itself will not produce anything.
So,...whatever route you think you are getting will,...itself,...be the key
to where it is getting it.
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com
"Brian E" <dirwolf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OKmPqSO3GHA.480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Okay, do you have any suggestions?
Because everything I see is that it is dynamic. If I delete one of those
routes it comes right back, and the other two will follow close behind.
"Phillip Windell" <@.> wrote in message
news:uwMA7%23N3GHA.4920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
My question is how in the world does 2000 dymanically learn routes without
running a
routing protocal?
It won't. You need to re-examine what you are looking at.
--
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dymanic route table problem
- From: Kurt
- Re: dymanic route table problem
- References:
- dymanic route table problem
- From: Brian E
- dymanic route table problem
- Prev by Date: Re: USB Sticks for users
- Next by Date: Re: dymanic route table problem
- Previous by thread: dymanic route table problem
- Next by thread: Re: dymanic route table problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
