Real reason for DHCP superscopes
- From: "gthuey@xxxxxxxxx" <gthuey@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Sep 2005 14:46:41 -0700
Hey everyone! I am trying to figure out the value of DHCP superscopes
and I know I am running into a mental block.
I totally understand what the intentions are, concerning multinets. I
also understand when they are NOT needed (ie scopes per subnet with ip
helper/boot relay on routers).
Well lets say we have a 192.168.1.x network and we are running out of
ip's so we decided to add another network 192.168.2.x to give some more
ips.
So according to MS I make my nifty superscope and add both of those
scopes to this scope. Great, but so what? Here is the crux of the
issue why would a superscope really be needed. Couldn't I just leave
the two scopes as independent scopes. They would both service the same
broadcast network, right?
I know I am missing one small piece of this puzzle, so any
enlightenment would be greatly appreciated. My problem is that I think
I am trying to read more into the superscope technology.
Thanks again for everyone's time.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: network tool for subnet question
- Next by Date: Re: Net view produces error 53 on Win2K3 servers but W2K servers
- Previous by thread: network tool for subnet question
- Next by thread: Netmon Gui in 2003
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading