Re: Connecting to Multiple networks
- From: Robbie <Robbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:51:20 -0700
Neteng,
Well to be honest they are not really fussed about a firewall, they are
happy to VLan absolutly everything off into seperate VLans but I know that
this will cause a Windows Administrative nightmare. I will try and get them
to go down the dual firewall route with somthing like a Netscreen and then a
PIX and stop the VLan Nonsence.
"Neteng" wrote:
> Your design is correct. With a two-tier firewall, you control access to and
> from everything in the DMZ, including "management protocols (ie SSH to a
> Unix box). I recently purchased, but haven't had a chance to read
> 073562061. For design I've heard the following are pretty good. My current
> job only exposes me to Cisco gear, but I was a server admin for years. I'm
> surprised that your Cisco guys only want a single firewall in place.
>
> ISBN: 0321305019
> ISBN: 0782143296
> ISBN: 1932266550 (I own this one, but it hasn't arrived yet)
>
> "Robbie" <Robbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:F7439519-8196-46A3-87DD-F4CB8074FF87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Also to add to the below,
> >
> > Do you know any good books regarding Windows and Security e.g. desiging a
> > network security plan I know there are ISBN 0-7356-2061-Xand ISBN
> > 0-7356-1969-7 are these any good or would you recommend any other books?
> >
> > Thank you in advance
> >
> > "Robbie" wrote:
> >
> > > Neteng,
> > >
> > > I am a windows engineer here and how I would structure the network is
> > > firewall then public facing servers and then firewall then private data
> > > servers. Everyone else here are Cisco network engineers and have Unix
> > > knowledge and they wish to have the structure firewall, Public servers,
> VLan,
> > > Management Network and then lock down the VLan.
> > >
> > > "Neteng" wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would not rely on NAT as a layer of protection between the public
> domain
> > > > and my private LAN.
> > > >
> > > > "Robbie" <Robbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > news:473E4898-3B14-4381-A226-D3DD0CEE6181@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > They are a mix of Windows 2000/2003. They do have a firewall on and
> also
> > > > > IPSec but NAT is not enabled.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you.
> > > > >
> > > > > Robert
> > > > >
> > > > > "Robert L [MS-MVP]" wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > we need more information to help. assuming this is windows 2000
> server,
> > > > enable NAT to protect your system.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > NAT and Firewall How to Setup Network, Internet Sharing, Remote
> Access
> > > > and VPN Step by Step Guide ... How to configure 2000/2003 NAT services
> and
> > > > ports ...
> > > > > > www.howtonetworking.com/Windows/NAT&firewall.htm
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bob Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
> > > > > > How to Setup Windows, Network, VPN & Remote Access on
> > > > http://www.HowToNetworking.com
> > > > > > Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on
> > > > http://www.ChicagoTech.net
> > > > > > "Robbie" <Robbie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > news:A386C256-9795-41DC-83B8-0815590F1ADA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > All,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > My Boss would like to set up a management backend network away
> from
> > > > the
> > > > > > external connection.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Basically Internal NIC 10.0.x.x
> > > > > > External NIC 80.x.x.x
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Will this work effectivly or is there a better way of setting up
> a
> > > > > > management network?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>
>
>
.
- References:
- Connecting to Multiple networks
- From: Robbie
- Re: Connecting to Multiple networks
- From: Robbie
- Re: Connecting to Multiple networks
- From: Neteng
- Re: Connecting to Multiple networks
- From: Robbie
- Re: Connecting to Multiple networks
- From: Robbie
- Re: Connecting to Multiple networks
- From: Neteng
- Connecting to Multiple networks
- Prev by Date: Re: DHCP Question
- Next by Date: Re: net use
- Previous by thread: Re: Connecting to Multiple networks
- Next by thread: RE: Connecting to Multiple networks
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|