Re: Do clients need to be registered in DNS in a non-NETBIOS (WINS) environment





In news:1119506754.838130.116260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Kenno1192 <kjmoule@xxxxxxx> typed:
> I am conducting some research into removing WINS and NETBIOS from our
> 2K/AD environment and have gathered a lot of good information via
> posts etc. but I am after a little more specific info which I am
> having difficulty in finding.
>
> To prelude my main question: In the NT world for clients to map drives
> etc. via NETBIOS it is [was] necessary to have the server names in
> WINS or some other NETBIOS resolution format - this is [was]
> particularly relevant for servers in remote subnets. Without WINS or
> any NETBIOS protocols whatsoever I would suspect that some other form
> of resolution would have to be made available to the clients and that
> resolution facility would be DNS (either static entries or
> dynamically updated).
>
> All this makes sense without doing any "real world" testing but the
> information I am more after is if the clients themselves need to be
> registered in DNS (dynamically or otherwise). I have a feeling they do
> because once a client makes a call to a server for a connection then
> the server will chat back to the client using some resolution process.
>
> Would much appreciate if you could correct me if I am wrong and/or
> steer me in the right direction.
>
> Thanks in advance
> Kenno

With AD, you need DNS to work perfectly. And all clients have to
register/update themselves dynamically in DNS or you'd have to statically
create the entries. If everyone's pointing at your AD-integrated DNS server
as their only DNS server, as they should (or, to another internal DNS server
that supports dynamic updates), they should work. Servers and workstations
both need to be doing this. Don't use any non-internal DNS IP address in a
computer/server's LAN IP config. The local/internal DNS server itself should
answer all queries & use forwarders and/or root hints for external name
resolution.

What's the reason you want to get rid of NetBIOS & WINS, if I may ask? You
don't mean NetBEUI, I'm sure.... (which should not be used). There are a lot
of reasons to keep NetBIOS around - legacy apps, and even Exchange server
likes it... I tend to leave it there.


.



Relevant Pages

  • RE: VPN Clients Not Registering in AD DNS
    ... via VPN, the DNS records of the VPN clients are unable to be registered. ... Windows 2003 server? ... please let me know whether the clients get the IP ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: Permissions across 2 Forrest
    ... Primary DNS server on 1.x and the 18.x network along with DHCP and WINS. ... For instance ForrestA DNS is now a secondary for Forrest B and vise versa. ... WINS clients must use the same "WINS Database"* ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: Still strange not fully working DNS server
    ... On none of the computers (both DC and clients) no firewall software is ... For the rest nothing happens in the DNS forward lookup zone. ... Is the new server Global catalog? ... The config you mentioned was not configured so I have configured ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.dns)
  • Re: Client installation frustration.
    ... not, apparently, any DNS lookup issues on my network. ... connection's addresses in DNS" and "Use this connection's DNS suffix in DNS ... is a file and print server that we have at one of our secondary sites. ... Is there any way to cancel all current requests to install clients? ...
    (microsoft.public.sms.admin)
  • Re: problem with xp clients and windows 2003
    ... We now have the cross cable running from the room's switch ... >> policy but logs into the server. ... >> aware that this is a DNS issue but I have TRIPLE checked the DNS ... >> If I do NSlookup from the problematic clients, ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)