Re: custom subnet mask
From: Steve (traygo_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/01/05
- Next message: Steve Riley [MSFT]: "Re: Group Policies over WLAN"
- Previous message: Steve Riley [MSFT]: "Re: What do I need to add a Win2k server to a Win2k3 AD through a FW"
- In reply to: Herb Martin: "Re: custom subnet mask"
- Next in thread: Herb Martin: "Re: custom subnet mask"
- Reply: Herb Martin: "Re: custom subnet mask"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:21:33 -0700
Possible network congestion point well taken, we'll have to see how congested
things get. I'm sure we'll never get over 300 clients (probably 280 max), and
30 of those will be printers, switches.
Thanks.
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:25:22 -0600, "Herb Martin" <news@LearnQuick.com> wrote:
>"Steve" <traygo@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:boiqv0pemkhqsmfpi1pn8gootqqmmdktth@4ax.com...
>>
>> Ok, then a 192.168.1.x machine can't communicate with a 192.168.2.x
>machine.
>> I just tried that, and indeed, it didn't work.
>> Thanks
>
>Not without a router.
>
>A 2.x can communitcate with 3.x without the router though.
>
>If these machines use the network heavily you may have
>a bandwidth problem and introducing a router and more
>subnets might be a useful consideration.
- Next message: Steve Riley [MSFT]: "Re: Group Policies over WLAN"
- Previous message: Steve Riley [MSFT]: "Re: What do I need to add a Win2k server to a Win2k3 AD through a FW"
- In reply to: Herb Martin: "Re: custom subnet mask"
- Next in thread: Herb Martin: "Re: custom subnet mask"
- Reply: Herb Martin: "Re: custom subnet mask"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|