Re: cannot connect two win2k computers
From: wendeebee (address_at_insig.com)
Date: 01/17/05
- Next message: Herb Martin: "Re: cannot connect two win2k computers"
- Previous message: Kenneth: "Re: cannot connect two win2k computers"
- In reply to: Herb Martin: "Re: cannot connect two win2k computers"
- Next in thread: Herb Martin: "Re: cannot connect two win2k computers"
- Reply: Herb Martin: "Re: cannot connect two win2k computers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:06:41 -0800
"Herb Martin" <news@LearnQuick.com> wrote in message
news:eFL%23YdB$EHA.3924@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > B (system-41b46a6e) ->A (Wendy-zmud8nvrn)
>
> First those (NetBIOS) names are suspicious but seem to be legal.
>
> They are LESS than 16 characters (I prefer less than 15 but this
> shouldn't matter here), and the "-" is technically legal, although
> again, I would only use INITIAL alphabetic, followed by up to
> 13 alphanumerics. They are however legal.
>
> Broadcast name resolution should work if the machines can
> ping and are on the same subnet (as the addresses sugget.)
>
> Such tends to argue for switch/hub issues, maybe cable.
>
> What are the plugged into? You need to give me a clear
> description of how each is physically connected (to what
> device etc.)
>
>
> > Ping by name:
> > c:\ping Wendy-zmud8nvrn
> > Unknown host Wendy-zmud8nvrn.
>
> Ok, name resolution fails -- the address is never tried,
> and in the next, we see IP work so this implies your
> network is basically working (hardware, IP addresses)
> and leads us back to name resolution. (So I spent a
> long time looking at those machine names to make sure
> they were legal.)
>
> > _______________________
> > Ping by Number:
> > Pinging 192.168.1.100 with 32 bytes of data:
> > Reply from 192.168.1.100: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
> > Ping statistics for 192.168.1.100:
> > Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
>
> IP worked B->A but fails the other direction.
> This almost never happens EXCEPT when B (the
> one that fails) is running a Firewall and has thereby
> disabled responding to pings.
>
> This means we really should check the Firewall on the
> NIC of machine B.
>
> > __________________________
> > Net Share:
> > Share name Resource Remark
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > Share E:\Share
> > The command completed successfully.
>
> Ok, they both have something NON-HIDDEN shared:
> i.e., that share named SHARE.
>
> > From Computer B:
> > IPconfig all:
> > Windows 2000 IP Configuration
> > Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : system-41b46a6e
> > Primary DNS Suffix . . . . . . . :
>
> This shouldn't matter since you are using the short
> or NetBIOS name in each attempt to connect.
>
> > Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcast
> > IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
> > WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
> > Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2:
> > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
> > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft Wireless PCI Adapter
MN-730
> > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0D-3A-6D-B9-DA
> > DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
> > Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
> > IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.101
> > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
> > Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
> > DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
> > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 206.47.244.113
> > 206.47.244.52
> > Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Sunday, January 16, 2005 12:46:01
PM
> > Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Monday, January 17, 2005 12:46:01
PM
> >
> > Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
> > Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Cable Disconnected
> > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : SiS 900-Based PCI Fast Ethernet
> Adapter
> > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0C-6E-4F-25-56
>
> Ok, I don't know what the above NIC is doing but it doesn't
> seem to be in use -- did you perhaps have a NIC
> in your computer and the cable company added another?
> Shouldn't hurt anything.
>
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > From Computer A:
> > Ipconfig /all:
> > Windows 2000 IP Configuration
> > Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : wendy-zmud8nvrn
> > Primary DNS Suffix . . . . . . . :
> > Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
> > IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
> > WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
> > Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 3:
> > Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Cable Disconnected
> > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Efficient Networks Enternet
P.P.P.o.E
> > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 44-45-53-54-77-77
> > Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
>
> One must wonder what this is? Did they perhaps install
> PPOE on your first machine (computer A) and it is
> acting a a virtual NIC (not a real one) and in some way
> taking over the real NIC?
>
> Someone else here may know the answer but I am suspicious
> of this as maybe being involved in the problem.
>
> > Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
> > Description . . . . . . . . . . . : 3Com EtherLink XL 10/100 PCI For
> > Complete PC Management NIC (3C905C-TX)
> > Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-04-75-8B-03-95
> > DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
> > Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : No
> > IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.100
> > Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
> > Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
> > DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.1
> > DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 206.47.244.113
> > 206.47.244.52
> > Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Sunday, January 16, 2005 4:42:50 AM
> > Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Monday, January 17, 2005 4:42:50 AM
> > _____________________________
> > Ping by name:
> > Unknown host System-41b46a6e.
> > _____________________________________
> > Ping by number:
> > Pinging 192.168.1.101 with 32 bytes of data:
> > Request timed out.
> > Ping statistics for 192.168.1.101:
> > Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
> > Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
> > Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
> > _____________________________________________
> > Net Share:
> > Share name Resource Remark
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> > IPC$ Remote IPC
> > Shared E:\Shared
> > The command completed successfully.
>
> What sort of machine is this? It doesn't seem to
> be NT-class (Win2000, XP etc) since it isn't automatically
> sharing it's C drive?
>
> > This is the current info from both machines.
> > Thank you,
> > Wendy
>
> I don't see it -- I am suspicious of the PPOE stuff,
> or perhaps the firewall on B.
>
> Otherwise it makes no sense that ping by number
> works only one direction.
>
> That must be fixed FIRST, then we move on to
> Name, then to seeing shares in Network Neighborhood.
>
> Otherwise you hardware devices are somehow
> suppressing the name broadcasts that must work (here)
> for name resolution.
>
> Again, I need you to describe precisely how this
> stuff is plugged together.
>
>
> --
> Herb Martin
>
HERB!!! Thank you SO MUCH for your time and effort. You pointed me in the
right direction, and that was firewall interference. There was a secondary
application running under Norton (2 icons running in the sys tray, I didn't
realize the other one was Norton as well), and I found the firewall settings
and told it to let Computer A (Wendy-zmud8nvrn) in. A ping here, a ping
there and we have communication.
In the meantime, I learned about Cmd prompt files, and that neat little
trick about getting them to write directly to a .txt file, and a whole lot
about communication.
I've been trying to figure this out since last Tuesday, so it is such a
relief to get it solved.
Again, thanks a million for your time and expertise. I couldn't have done it
without you, and I'm saving all your emails to my geeky win2000 archives.
Have a great night!
--Wendy
-- wendeebee @sympatico .ca
- Next message: Herb Martin: "Re: cannot connect two win2k computers"
- Previous message: Kenneth: "Re: cannot connect two win2k computers"
- In reply to: Herb Martin: "Re: cannot connect two win2k computers"
- Next in thread: Herb Martin: "Re: cannot connect two win2k computers"
- Reply: Herb Martin: "Re: cannot connect two win2k computers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]