Re: TTL modification while routing IP packets
From: Herb Martin (news_at_LearnQuick.com)
Date: 01/14/05
- Next message: Herb Martin: "Re: Ethernet Printer behind router"
- Previous message: Herb Martin: "Re: Netwroking Between Windows 2000 & XP ?"
- In reply to: Steve Riley [MSFT]: "Re: TTL modification while routing IP packets"
- Next in thread: Steve Riley [MSFT]: "Re: TTL modification while routing IP packets"
- Reply: Steve Riley [MSFT]: "Re: TTL modification while routing IP packets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:58:47 -0600
"Steve Riley [MSFT]" <steriley@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:49929632412265830105790@news.microsoft.com...
> It's ok, Herb, this way we know you're human, like (most of) the rest of
> us :)
>
> Long time ago 30 was a de facto TTL used in a lot of devices. We set the
> default TTL in Windows NT 3.51 to 32. Starting with NT 4.0 we increased
the
> default TTL to 128, which is still where it is today.
That's what I remembered. It was 30, then one day I
blinked and it was 128.
> You can change the default, if you wish, with the "DefaultTTL : REG_DWORD"
> key in the "Tcpip\Parameters" branch. The range can be from 1 to 255. Of
> course, this applies only to packets that the computer generates. RRAS
follows
> its normal decrement-whatever-the-current-is-by-1 behavior when forwarding
> packets.
In order to have >128 be useful, it would imply he is trying to
reach a destination more than 128 routers away. What is that,
Alpha Centauri, or Andromeda?
-- Herb Martin "Steve Riley [MSFT]" <steriley@microsoft.com> wrote in message news:49929632412265830105790@news.microsoft.com... > It's ok, Herb, this way we know you're human, like (most of) the rest of > us :) > > Long time ago 30 was a de facto TTL used in a lot of devices. We set the > default TTL in Windows NT 3.51 to 32. Starting with NT 4.0 we increased the > default TTL to 128, which is still where it is today. > > You can change the default, if you wish, with the "DefaultTTL : REG_DWORD" > key in the "Tcpip\Parameters" branch. The range can be from 1 to 255. Of > course, this applies only to packets that the computer generates. RRAS follows > its normal decrement-whatever-the-current-is-by-1 behavior when forwarding > packets. > > Steve Riley > steriley@microsoft.com > > > > > "Steve Riley [MSFT]" <steriley@microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:49038632412067451211383@news.microsoft.com... > > > >> Don't confuse IP packet TTLs with DNS record TTLs, they're different. > >> The OP is asking about Windows RRAS routing functionality for IP > >> packet TTLs. > >> > > Excuse me. > > > > For some (strange) reason, I though the question > > was about DNS. > >> Jakub, there's no facility in Windows that will let you do this. RRAS > >> does what any router should: it decremets the TTL by one when it > >> forwards a > >> > > packet > > > >> across an interface. You can't change or alter this behavior. Why do > >> you need this functionality? > >> > > Aren't the modern default VERY high anyway? > > > >> Steve Riley > >> steriley@microsoft.com > >>> "Jakub Lida" <shibbsd@o2.pl> wrote in message > >>> news:cs638e$8tn$1@srv.cyf-kr.edu.pl... > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> Is it possible to modify the TTL of packets that are being > >>>> forwarded by a Windows 2000/2003 router? I mean re-setting TTL for > >>>> them or ensuring that it is not lower/higher than a specified value > >>>> (as it is possible for example in OpenBSD's pf filter with a "scrub > >>>> all reassemble tcp min-ttl 2"). > >>>> > >>> Anything is "possible" but the is no built in facility for that and > >>> it seems rather silly since the OWNER (authoritative servers) for > >>> the zone decides the correct TTL for his own records. > >>> > >>> Their are settings on MS DNS Server and Client DNS cache that sets a > >>> MAXIMUM however (I believe). > >>> > >>> The clients default to 1 day max rather than the actual value of the > >>> TTL (if it is greater.) > >>> > >>>> Thank you very much for your help! > >>>> > >>>> Kuba <shibbsd@o2.pl> > >>>> Krakow, PL > >
- Next message: Herb Martin: "Re: Ethernet Printer behind router"
- Previous message: Herb Martin: "Re: Netwroking Between Windows 2000 & XP ?"
- In reply to: Steve Riley [MSFT]: "Re: TTL modification while routing IP packets"
- Next in thread: Steve Riley [MSFT]: "Re: TTL modification while routing IP packets"
- Reply: Steve Riley [MSFT]: "Re: TTL modification while routing IP packets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|