Re: Help with Internet sharing on separate network using NAT

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

From: SolRodriguez (SolRodriguez_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 01/07/05 

Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:27:01 -0800

Thanks for the help. I felt like I was getting close... :)

Question: by VLAN do you mean virtual as in Virtual Server? Because I am
setting this up using virtual server. How does this change things? Thanks
again.

"Doug Sherman [MVP]" wrote:

> Assuming you are not using VLans - If NICexternal is connected to the SOHO
> router, it must have a 192.168.1.x address. Depending on the capabilities
> of the SOHO router, you may not need NAT on the Win 2000 server. Try simply
> enabling LAN routing.
>
> NICexternal should have a default gateway of 192.168.1.1. NICinternal
> should have no default gateway, and machines connected to the 192.168.2.x
> network should have a default gateway of 192.168.2.1. The SOHO router needs
> a static route for the 192.168.2.0 network pointing to the IP address of
> NICexternal. If the router does not have this capability, use NAT on the
> Win2k Server. You may have problems running NAT behind a NAT router, but
> this usually works.
>
> Doug Sherman
> MCSE Win2k/NT4.0, MCSA, MCP+I, MVP
>
> "SolRodriguez" <SolRodriguez@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:3094DE5C-D6C8-4C82-AB14-2C7212A1B104@microsoft.com...
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am trying to set up a separate newtwork in order to establish a testing
> > "lab" for work. How do I set up NAT in order to allow my new network to
> > access the internet as well?
> >
> > Scenario: one domain is on the 192.168.1.0 network behind a SOHO
> > router/gateway with the ip 192.168.1.1. I have set up a new server using
> Win
> > 2000 with the network address 192.168.2.0 also behind this router/gateway.
> > Can I use NAT on this new Win 2000 server to aqcuire and share internet
> > access to other computers I put on the 192.168.2.0 network?
> >
> > So far I have set up RRAS and installed the NAT protocol. I have 2 NICS.
> > NICinternal has the ip address 192.168.2.1 and NICexternal has 192.168.2.2
> >
> > Am I getting close?
> >
> > Sol
> >
> > --
> > Computers and music geek. Too bad I'm good at music and it doesn't pay,
> but
> > I'm lost with computers and it still pays.
> > http://www.sunbenttowers.com
>
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Do you have a FreeBSD NAT gateway?
    ... my xDSL provider provides a router, not a modem, which means that it does NAT already at the router. ... I have configured the xDSL router to forward all ports to my firewall / NAT gateway. ... setting up a caching dns on you gateway, or testing for dns problems on your Mac mini? ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
  • Re: PPPoE Configuration
    ... Not all routers do NAT. ... The routers in the internet network cloud have no ... there is a difference between a router and a gateway. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Simple Routing using FC2/3
    ... >> This silly routing thing is driving me buzzonkers. ... >> first email concerning the gateway address of the LAN PC. ... > the 192.168.213.x addresses back to your router box. ... > NAT on the router box you are describing so all of the 192.168.213.x net ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: which router will run in bridge mode and carry out PPPoA authentication?
    ... x.x.x.158 as the gateway address. ... Get a BT supported router or a Draytek - anyone who will ... can do NAT as well, ...
    (uk.telecom.broadband)
  • Re: which router will run in bridge mode and carry out PPPoA authentication?
    ... x.x.x.158 as the gateway address. ... Get a BT supported router or a Draytek - anyone who will ... can do NAT as well, ...
    (uk.telecom.broadband)