Re: dmz
From: Phillip Windell (none_at_here.org)
Date: 12/12/04
- Next message: Herb Martin: "Re: dmz"
- Previous message: Phillip Windell: "Re: Internet Explorer-hangs on launch"
- In reply to: jas0n: "dmz"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: dmz"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: dmz"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:53:40 -0600
It doen't sound like you have a DMZ to begin with.
DMZs, all types, are always completely separate and distinct subnets
Tri-Homed DMZs are always publicly registered IP#s.
Back-to-Back DMZs can be either public or private IP#s although using
private IP#s makes it more limited in capabilty and the use of publicly
registered IP#s is recommended.
-- Phillip Windell [At Home] "jas0n" <no@email.here> wrote in message news:41bc92ef$0$217$bed64819@news.gradwell.net... > is there a need or benefit to have a dmz setup on a different subnet mask > to > the rest of the network? > > the main network is setup with 255.255.240.0 mask with a different subnet > for each site, the dmz is setup as 255.255.255.0 with the poor choice of > 192.168.0.x network (im saying poor choice as its the default network of > many home lans) > > >
- Next message: Herb Martin: "Re: dmz"
- Previous message: Phillip Windell: "Re: Internet Explorer-hangs on launch"
- In reply to: jas0n: "dmz"
- Next in thread: Steven L Umbach: "Re: dmz"
- Reply: Steven L Umbach: "Re: dmz"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|