Re: IE Routing Problem
From: DDJ (johnson_at_milehi.com)
Date: 07/28/04
- Next message: Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]: "Re: IE Routing Problem"
- Previous message: Chris C.: "Re: Sharing a DSL connection between two networks securely?"
- In reply to: DDJ: "Re: IE Routing Problem"
- Next in thread: Ace Fekay [MVP]: "Re: IE Routing Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:21:36 -0600
FYI, I changed the MTU to 1492 on both the firewall and the client box...no
change, browser still fails after a few minutes.
Dan
"DDJ" <johnson@milehi.com> wrote in message
news:lGTNc.32$u77.37507@news.uswest.net...
> To try and make this easier to read, I have added my responses below...
>
> "Ace Fekay [MVP]" <firstnamelastname@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uZ516jNdEHA.1356@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >
> > "DDJ" <johnson@milehi.com> wrote in message
> > news:DbSNc.25$u77.31198@news.uswest.net...
> > > We have ADSL.
> > >
> > > Ran the provided test. Although the Win2000 box I was using did not
> have
> > an
> > > MTU value in the registry, I added. Per the MTU test, the optimal
> setting
> > > would be 1404. NOTE: that this is the setting in our firewall as well
> > (says
> > > something about "fragment outbound packets larger than 1404")
> > >
> > > The browser does not have an proxy settings in place.
> > >
> > > Tested browser after adding MTU value...still doesn't work. The
> firewall
> > > forwards packets to the router, do routers generally provide for an
MTU
> > > setting?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> >
> > Actually 1404 is really awfully low. The definition of an MTU is the
> actual
> > TCP packet size. The largest possible TCP packet size is 1500 bytes.
ADSL
> > using PPPoE lowers the MTU to 1492, using up 8 bytes for the PPPoE
> overhead.
> > So 1492 is the common one I've seen it drop lower, depending on the ADSL
> > modem. The router will accomodate the modem. The lower it is, the more
> > difficulty there will be with IE and browsing.
>
> I will change this after sending this message to see if it has any impact.
> I remember that we originally changed it to accomodate a request from
> SonicWall when setting up a VPN.
>
> >
> > What type of modem do you have?
> > What type of router do you have that is connected to the modem?
>
> We have a SonicWall SoHo 100 firewall (which is the IP = 192.168.168.1)
and
> an ActionTec DSL Modem/Router (LAN IP = 192.168.168.2, WAN IP should
remain
> private). All packets coming in through the ActionTec are routed to the
> SonicWall. All client boxes point to the SonicWall as the Gateway and to
> the DC (192.168.168.187) as the DNS. Should I not be posting all of this
IP
> info here for security reasons??? I have assumed that since they are
> internal addresses, it doesn't matter, but let me know if you think
> otherwise.
>
> >
> > I was trying to re-read your previous response, but I apogize that I am
> > getting lost in your terminology. Here's what you previously posted:
> >
> > ======================
> > > Each box is pointed to a firewall as the gateway
> > > (192.168.168.1) and to the DC as the DNS Server
> > > (192.168.168.187). The DC points to the ISP-provided two
> > > DNS servers. The common firewall gateway (192.168.168.1)
> > > forwards to the router (192.168.168.2) which forwards to
> > > the ISP's router.
> > ======================
> >
> > Now this part (the paragraph below) is the part I really do not
understand
> > because of the IP addresses that are mentioned, hence my previous
thought
> > you were "arping" packets across an OpenBSD bridged firewall, which I
know
> > not too many people use or know how to setup.
> > ...
> > > "The common firewall gateway (192.168.168.1)
> > > forwards to the router (192.168.168.2) which forwards to
> > > the ISP's router."
> > ...
> >
> > Now, let's break this down. Your 'firewall' is also your router? What
> brand
> > is it?
> > That "common firewall gateway (192.168.168.1) you mention, is that the
> above
> > firewall/router? Or are you saing that the firewall gateway and the
router
> > are two different things? Or is the router actually an ADSL modem?
>
> If I understand how this works correctly, the SonicWall is the router,
> although all the SonicWall does is pass outgoing packets to the ActionTec
> (in addition obviously to handling incoming packets from the ActionTec).
>
> >
> > From the way you described that, it seems like that the 'common firewall
> > gateway with an IP of 192.168.168.1, which is connected to your internal
> > subnet, which your internal subnet uses as a gateway, has its other
> > interface (which by definition of a 'router') configured wtih an IP on
the
> > same subnet and is connected to your ISP's router with an IP on the same
> > subnet as the internal subnet, but should be a totally different subnet.
> So
> > based on the terminology used, I am completey lost on how this is
> > configured.
>
> I remember when we first set this up last year, I had also thought that we
> needed to set the LAN side IP of the ActionTec to a different subnet than
> the WAN side IP of the SonicWall (hope I said that right!). It was either
> Qwest or SonicWall, however, that said we needed to do it this way. It
WAS
> working for some time though, so I am curious why it has gone crazy now.
>
> Hopefully the above helps you understand. Let me know if not, and thanks
> for your patience!
>
> >
> > Can you break that down for me?
> > What name brand router?
> > What name brand firewall?
> > What name brand modem (if it is)?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Ace
> >
> > Please direct all replies ONLY to the Microsoft public newsgroups
> > so all can benefit.
> >
> > This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees
> > and confers no rights.
> >
> > Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSE+I, MCT, MVP
> > Microsoft Windows MVP - Windows Server - Directory Services
> >
> > Security Is Like An Onion, It Has Layers
> > HAM AND EGGS: A day's work for a chicken;
> > A lifetime commitment for a pig.
> > --
> > =================================
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
- Next message: Kevin D. Goodknecht Sr. [MVP]: "Re: IE Routing Problem"
- Previous message: Chris C.: "Re: Sharing a DSL connection between two networks securely?"
- In reply to: DDJ: "Re: IE Routing Problem"
- Next in thread: Ace Fekay [MVP]: "Re: IE Routing Problem"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|