Server too Expensive...
From: Bob Sisson (Bob_at_Sisson)
Date: 07/17/04
- Next message: Wybrand Thuynsma: "Re: Dail-up and Hardware devices dissappear"
- Previous message: Craig N.: "Re: Very Strange Network Problem HELP!!!"
- In reply to: Bob Sisson: "ICS and Static addresses?"
- Next in thread: Ace Fekay [MVP]: "Re: Server too Expensive..."
- Reply: Ace Fekay [MVP]: "Re: Server too Expensive..."
- Reply: Herb Martin: "Re: Server too Expensive..."
- Reply: Jeff Cochran: "Re: Server too Expensive..."
- Reply: Richard G. Harper: "Re: Server too Expensive..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 11:38:02 -0400
I appreciate all the responses. I would prefer a "Server" rather than a
workstation to perform my gateway (ICS) duties, but the cost is too high.
With 10+ stations on the intranet, I have been told I would need 10 CALs and
that really drives up the cost. I was HOPING that since all I was doing was
running ICS and file sharing I wouldn't need CALS but have been told
elsewise. I can get server (2000, XP, 2003) cheep, but the CALs are another
story.
I have seen a DHCP server program that will run on a workstation, and I will
look into that to see if I can turn off the ICS mini-server, or got with a
router.
Microsoft seems to have left a "hole" in their product line for the SOHO
offices and large technology families. Even SBS is expensive when you need
lots of CALS. SBS might make sense if I wanted Exchange, but we don't use
it.
Bob Sisson
- Next message: Wybrand Thuynsma: "Re: Dail-up and Hardware devices dissappear"
- Previous message: Craig N.: "Re: Very Strange Network Problem HELP!!!"
- In reply to: Bob Sisson: "ICS and Static addresses?"
- Next in thread: Ace Fekay [MVP]: "Re: Server too Expensive..."
- Reply: Ace Fekay [MVP]: "Re: Server too Expensive..."
- Reply: Herb Martin: "Re: Server too Expensive..."
- Reply: Jeff Cochran: "Re: Server too Expensive..."
- Reply: Richard G. Harper: "Re: Server too Expensive..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|