Re: Public and a Private network on one Win2k Server box
From: Phillip Windell (_at_.)
Date: 06/07/04
- Next message: Shane Brasher: "Re: MTU size: increasing network performance"
- Previous message: Phillip Windell: "Re: Setting Up a VPN on W2000"
- In reply to: mgm: "Re: Public and a Private network on one Win2k Server box"
- Next in thread: DS: "Re: Public and a Private network on one Win2k Server box"
- Reply: DS: "Re: Public and a Private network on one Win2k Server box"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 09:25:13 -0500
Guys!
Don't use ICS!!
Before everyone goes rushing off in five directions.....here's all that has
to be done in Win2k Server. I believe they are both basically the same
article.
299801 - HOW TO: Configure a Windows 2000 Server as a Network Address
Translation Server
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q299801
310357 - HOW TO: Configure the NAT Service in Windows 2000
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;310357
-- Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA] www.wandtv.com "mgm" <mgmombo@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Oe7m38oSEHA.1508@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... > p.s... the limitation of Windows os's is that they can't directly specify > which nic will handle which application; i.e. Internet Explorer. If I > understood the isp tech support correctly, Linux does have this ability. He > stated that he has heard this prob. numerous times. He diagnosed this issue > right away and had me enable/disable each network to zero in on the prob. > "DS" <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@a.d.e.l.p.h.i.a..n.e.t> wrote in message > news:Xns94FEC6ACBDC2Eidispcom@216.65.98.77... > > "mgm" <mgmombo@hotmail.com> wrote in > > news:OtKIp9nSEHA.3476@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl: > > > > > Is this possible and what is the best way to accomplish the following: > > > > > > I've attempted and run into difficulty when using 2 nics on my win2k > > > server. I use the public network (straight from cable modem, DHCP and > > > AutoConfig used) for my internet connection and the private network > > > (behind a router, static IPs assigned and NetBios over TCP/IP used) > > > for my local network. The connections were established and succeed for > > > both when each of the networks are enabled by themselves. Neither pub > > > or private netwrk will stay connected while the other network is > > > enabled. I contacted the ISP, their 2nd level support states that this > > > is a known limitation of windows and that I should use a Linux OS for > > > such a hardware configuration. I am more familiar with and would like > > > to stay with the windows OS, but I don't know of any work-around for > > > this config. TIA for any and all assistance > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would assume the NIC connected to the cable modem would be assigned the > > only public IP address, so the Win2K server is acting as a router and > doing > > NAT ? > > > > Cable modem -> W2K-NIC1 -> W2K-NIC2 -> Router (WAN port ?)-> Router E-Net > > -> PC(s). > > > > What is the known limitation that they cited ? It seems like it should > > work, although it does involve 3 subnet's counting the Internet and some > > manual routing. Maybe not. Let me think....... > > > > > > DS > > > > > >
- Next message: Shane Brasher: "Re: MTU size: increasing network performance"
- Previous message: Phillip Windell: "Re: Setting Up a VPN on W2000"
- In reply to: mgm: "Re: Public and a Private network on one Win2k Server box"
- Next in thread: DS: "Re: Public and a Private network on one Win2k Server box"
- Reply: DS: "Re: Public and a Private network on one Win2k Server box"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|