Re: Network Configuration

From: Phillip Windell (_at_.)
Date: 05/10/04


Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 15:59:23 -0500

The scope of this is so large it is nearly impossible to answer in a simple
newsgroup message. You have the physical topology, the logical topology, and
the capabilities of the
individual hardware device just to even begin the conversation.

Now if you are getting about 200 machines then you may need to look at
subnetting just because of that. Broadcasts are the biggest killer of a LAN
and those aren't effect by "where the user usually goes", and the user
doesn't even have to be at their machine doing anything. Broadcasts don't
cross routers, therefore the routers will recover lost bandwith.

You can also design the system using VLANs. It this case where the user is
physically located doesn't even matter. The users are segmented "logically"
by what they do and what they use, and not where they are or what floor they
are on.

-- 
Phillip Windell [MCP, MVP, CCNA]
www.wandtv.com
"Carl Hilton" <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:%23A1HHEsNEHA.2844@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> We currently have three router/hub/switches one, for each floor of our
> building. We have numerous subnets which are now randomly scattered all
over
> the building using static IP's. I am contemplating going to DHCP and am
> interested in knowing if there is a technical reason, why I should try to
> keep the subnets focused on each floor. Currently the majority of the
> traffic is going either out to the internet or to our computer room
servers,
> all located off of one of the routers/switch/hubs. This means that the
> majority of traffic on the other two router/switch/hubs is just being
> purshed to the third, which is leaning me to believe that there is NO
reason
> to try to create a DHCP configuration whereby each floor will get their
own
> subnet.
>
> Carl
>
>


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Best solution to segment subnets
    ... i have a no clear idea of this scenario, maybe so nat routers are confusing me. ... subnet 1 and subnet 2 are two room in the second floor, i need isolate them from subnet 3 and from each other. ... Three subnets need internet. ... It won't isolate the subnets if the switches are uplinked to each other. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.ras_routing)
  • Re: Best approach for broadcasting a notifivation to another progr
    ... I think that normally routers block all broadcasts by default, ... I have found that many admins will allow broadcasts between them (at least ... As for the Terminal server issue, I don't know how that would do. ... I have a customer that has two subnets joined by Cisco pix ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: EIGRP Configuration Help
    ... all single-homed locations are configured as stub. ... Subnets again much similar. ... The network design is archaic and a relic of the past in terms of subnets, ... stub routing on each of these routers. ...
    (comp.dcom.sys.cisco)
  • Help: Tunneling multicast
    ... I want to tunnel multicast DNS (zeroconf/rendezvous, ... The routers connecting ... these subnets do not route multicast, and I don't control the router. ... But I do have linux boxes in all four subnets. ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Access Point For 10 Simultaneous Users
    ... I would suggest you check out the new MIMO routers. ... I wanted to provide wireless internet access throughout the ... > house because it would be a lot easier than wiring cat5 everywhere. ... > on the first floor via our cable internet provider. ...
    (alt.internet.wireless)