Re: Please HELP... dhcp / ip / nic issues

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: microsoft (turbovw18_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 03/31/04 

Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:34:41 -0500

update...

it seems as if i release the adapter and reboot everything is ok... but...
if i release the adapter and renew it... it pulls 192.169.233.x as the
localhost ... and sets the gateway to 192.168.233.2 ....

i have never seen these ip's before and they ARE NOT any part of my WAN....

anyone ever run into this before????

thanks

sonny

"microsoft" <turbovw18@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23AsAGI1FEHA.684@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> the subnets are physically seperated in respect to being at different
> sites... 192.16 and 192.168
>
> but the subnets 192.16.100 and 192.16.101 are inhouse, so they are
> logical... correct?
>
> if i remove the superscope, won't i have to reconfig my dhcp? also,
> wouldn't this require me to change the subnets already mapped? meaning i'd
> have to re-lease all ip's?
>
> as of now the users think everything is normal... so i do not want to
> interrupt their workflow...
>
> thanks for the reply
>
> and sorry for my ignorance.
> "Marc Reynolds [MSFT]" <marcrey@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:%23rkFh60FEHA.2404@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > Are the two subnets physically separated or logically separated? If they
> are
> > physically separated you should not use a superscope. You should remove
> the
> > superscope and you don't need to reboot the DHCP server to do this.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marc Reynolds
> > Microsoft Technical Support
> >
> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> >
> >
> > "microsoft" <turbovw18@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:#dYE4i0FEHA.2980@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am in a tight situation here... we are currently rebuilding our
> > domain
> > > to allow clustering and live fail overs to avoid downtime. The people
> in
> > > charge of my company want ZERO downtime in any case... so we are
working
> > on
> > > that.
> > >
> > > in the meantime an issue has developed... please help me with any
> > > recommendations... i will try to spit it all out right here...
> > >
> > > issue at hand
> > > -------------------
> > >
> > > i have a win 2k master server... dealing out dhcp / dns / wins and is
> file
> > > serv / print serv and so on... i have 3 basic subnets... .2.0 .100.0
and
> > > .101.0... 2 is mainly servers and not dealt up with DHCP... i do
however
> > > have a super scope created for 192.16.0.0 but the DHCP range is
> > > 192.16.100.1 - 192.16.101.254 ... it seems that the leases for the 100
> > > subnet were all taken up ... and it also appears that it is not
dealing
> > out
> > > 101 subnet IPs.
> > >
> > > User end is showing no error, just sometimes popping up saying that
the
> > > roaming profile cannot be found and that they are logged on with a
> cached
> > > local.... ipconfig /all shows that it's pulling down a localhost IP...
> > > 192.168.233.x.... a release will release this ip and have no config...
> but
> > a
> > > /renew will return the error.... 'an error occured while renewing the
> > > interface local area connection: access is denied' .... i'm doing this
> as
> > > the network admin account and the local admin account... same error...
> > >
> > > i killed all intersite replication and stopped the dhcp services on my
> > > remote site DC's just to rule them out... the ONLY way to get my
people
> > back
> > > up on the network is to jump them to a new subnet, and MANUALLY set
the
> ip
> > /
> > > mask / gate / dns.... i just picked the subnet 192.16.200.x ...
everyone
> > is
> > > working fine now and is good to go, but that is because we ran around
> for
> > 3
> > > hours manually setting ip adds.
> > >
> > > i've done everything i can think of and have found no solution... no
> > domain
> > > policy set, security policy, group policy... no event log errors or
even
> > > information about anything wrong with DHCP... it thinks that it's
> fine...
> > >
> > > i do not want to kill my super scope and scope out seperate subnets...
.
> > > mainly because i CANNOT reboot this server until friday night or
> > saturday...
> > > so i would like to come to a conclusion... i extended the leases on
DHCP
> > to
> > > avoid people getting dropped... but i would really like to know why
> these
> > > cards are pulling some bogus local IP ... then once dropped not
allowing
> a
> > > network DHCP config.
> > >
> > > Thank you for any responce.
> > >
> > > Sonny
> > > smcmanigle@thorpreed.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Relevant Pages

  • 2.6.36 abrupt total e1000e carrier loss (cured by reboot)
    ... the time when busy servers get upgraded without ... I was just congratulating myself on an upgrade to ... But then, an hour or so after reboot, the server dropped off the net ... A register dump from the failed adapter: ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Question on strange ethernet issues
    ... Your note specifies that a reboot does not clear the problem. ... Question on strange ethernet issues ... adapter we are ... This email communication and any ...
    (AIX-L)
  • Re: delete a program that the OS locked
    ... I did remove the program and the adapter driver. ... I can boot by using Safe Mode, and find out under Network ... After i disable them the reboot problem still there. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)
  • Re: Weird IP address picked using DHCP
    ... Reboot pc, try again. ... Toggle from windows zero config to the manufacturer's client software ... Run that MS stack fix Maxwell linked to. ... Try a different wireless adapter. ...
    (alt.internet.wireless)
  • Re: delete a program that the OS locked
    ... Reboot in Safe Mode, ... > I am using USB wireless adapter. ... > I can boot by using Safe Mode, ... > I can only disable them instead of uninstall them. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)