Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication...
From: David Bock (David_at_dvbock.com)
Date: 03/15/04
- Next message: Phil Teale: "Routing table question"
- Previous message: Louis Hardy [MS]: "Re: Wireless LAN"
- In reply to: Alex Zhang: "Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication..."
- Next in thread: Alex Zhang: "Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication..."
- Reply: Alex Zhang: "Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:06:10 -0600
OK, I thought I was in the right place, but I will try over there...
David Bock
"Alex Zhang(MSFT)" <v-qiz@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:z7HVlMpCEHA.3164@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl...
> Hello David,
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> Please post this question in the
> microsoft.public.windows2000.Active_directory newsgroup. The
> microsoft.public.windows2000.Active_directory newsgroup is primarily for
> issues involving Active Directory. We recommend posting appropriately so
> you will get the most qualified pool of respondents, and so other partners
> who regularly read the newsgroups can either share their knowledge or
learn
> from your interaction with us.
>
> In addition, I am glad to provide some information to you.
>
> When a slow link is detected, the default behavior is as follows:
>
> Policies that are applied by default:
> Registry settings (from administrative templates) must always be
> applied--this cannot be changed
> Security policies must always be applied - this cannot be changed)
> EFS recovery policy
> IP security
> Policies that are not applied:
> Application Deployment
> Scripts
> Folder Redirection
> Disk Quotas
>
> Therefore you could try to change the slow link detection speed to be
> higher.
>
> To change the slow link detection speed for Windows 2000 when user Group
> Policy is being applied, expand the User Configuration node and navigate
to
> the Administrative Templates\System\Group Policy folder. Modify the Group
> Policy slow link detection policy.
>
> For more information you may browse the following websites:
> How a Slow Link Is Detected for Processing User Profiles and Group Policy
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;227260
>
> Default Behavior for Group Policy Extensions with Slow Link
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;227369
>
> In addition, I am glad to provide you some related information about
Active
> Directory replication:
> Active Directory Replication Events During Scheduled Available Windows
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;228866
>
> HOW TO: Configure Site Link Replication in Windows 2000
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;321253
>
> Determining the Inter-Site Topology Generator (ISTG) of a Site in the
> Active Directory
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;224599
>
> The Role of the Inter-Site Topology Generator in Active Directory
> Replication
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;224815
>
> Active Directory Replication
> http://labmice.techtarget.com/activedirectory/AD_replication.htm
>
> This response contains a reference to a third-party World Wide Web site.
> Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. Microsoft
> does not control these sites and has not tested any software or
information
> found on these sites; therefore, Microsoft cannot make any representations
> regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any software or
> information found there. There are inherent dangers in the use of any
> software found on the Internet, and Microsoft cautions you to make sure
> that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any software
from
> the Internet.
>
> I hope the information proves helpful!
> If you have any questions please do not hesitate to let me know. I am
glad
> to be of assistance.
> Thanks and regards,
> Alex Zhang
> Microsoft Partner Online Support
> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
>
> =====================================================
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
> =====================================================
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
> --------------------
> | Reply-To: "David Bock" <David@dvbock.com>
> | From: "David Bock" <David@dvbock.com>
> | References: <OsqSXo4BEHA.2888@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
> <3UaG3IDCEHA.600@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
> | Subject: Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication...
> | Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 09:52:15 -0600
> | Lines: 146
> | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
> | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> | Message-ID: <emTQsMRCEHA.240@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
> | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
> | NNTP-Posting-Host: cust-216-59-196-46.t-speed.net 216.59.196.46
> | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
> | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.win2000.networking:58100
> | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
> |
> | Thanks Alex...If I may call you Alex.
> | I have 3 subnodes and 1 central office.
> | ->ISDN lines at remote locations start at a Pipeline ISDN router
(10.0.x)
> | network, I have each node set as a class C, a server at each location.
> | ->Internal ISDN router is a Ascend Max (10.0.1.1)
> | -> Internet connection is through a Netscreen Firewall, We have a VPN
> | connection set through this. (10.0.1.2)
> | -> Internally we use a company called T-Speed for a broadband connection
> | (Microwave 1-6MBPS) at main location
> | -> On Node 10.0.3.x we also have a T-Speed Connection
> | -> DNS server uses 10.0.1.1 as gateway, which forwards to 10.0.1.2 for
out
> | to the internet.
> | -> I have disabled the 10.0.3.x ISDN connection, and enabled an internet
> VPN
> | through my Firewall (10.0.1.2)
> | -> Windows 2000 Network Main domain is on 10.0.1.x (GC at 10.0.1.20,
Exch
> | Server 10.0.1.30)
> | -> on node 10.0.3.x there is a trusted domain (I didn't set it up)
> | -> When we set up the VPN the remote server took all available bandwidth
> | through the tunnell, and there was no room for other traffic through the
> | connection. I throttled the connection down to 384k, and I was able to
> | access the internet.
> | -> The ISDN is a dual B channell (384K)
> | -> switching over, I disabled the ISDN connection through the Ascend,
and
> | enabled the VPN
> | -> Database is on 10.0.1.20 (Master GC) and I if the connection goes
down
> we
> | cannot access the database, so I think it is all in 1 place
> | -> Right now I have a router problem, so 10.0.4.X, 10.0.5.X cannot see
the
> | internet, I have a the person who sold me the ISDN routers coming by
today
> | to fix that problem.
> | -> Before I throttled down the bandwith the VPN tunnel expanded to the
> full
> | bandwidth available from traffic between the servers, and there was no
> | available bandwidth for anybody.
> | -> I would (ideally) like to be able to have the connection be down and
> use
> | the SQL at all locations, but I have security concerns.
> | -> I think that there is a better way for the directory structure (as in
> | sub-domains not trusted Domains)
> | -> I would like to let all connections run at full speed.
> | -> I have a 512K DSL connection that I will be changing over at 10.0.4.X
> | once we get this all figured out.
> |
> | I really apreciate your help on this, I understand what I needed to set
up
> | the Active directory on a local system, but I am not sure once we get to
> | WANS and routers how things need to be to replicate. Is there a book or
> text
> | I could use to help me through this?
> |
> | Thanks again,
> | David Bock
> |
> |
> | "Alex Zhang(MSFT)" <v-qiz@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> | news:3UaG3IDCEHA.600@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl...
> | > Hello David,
> | >
> | > Thank you for posting here.
> | >
> | > If I understand the issue correctly, you have a central location and
> | three
> | > sub locations. You connect these three various locations with 3 ISDN
> | lines.
> | > Now you are going to update some of the lines to DSL with VPN.
> | >
> | > To understand the issue better, I'd like to confirm the following
> | > information with you:
> | >
> | > 1. How do you update ISDN to DSL? What¡¯s the varieties on hardware?
Do
> | you
> | > use a router or other hardware? Any detail informaiton about the
network
> | is
> | > helpful.
> | >
> | > 2. How do you switch the connection over to broadband the 2 servers
> | > communicate with all available bandwidth? Do you modify the
> configuration
> | > on the router or using other methods?
> | >
> | > 3. What¡¯s the value of all available bandwidth?
> | >
> | > 4. Does the database locate in the central location?
> | >
> | > 5. Which location can not access internet?
> | >
> | > 6. Do you have any other concerns?
> | >
> | > 7. Can you explain in detail ¡°leave the tunnel up with all available
> | > bandwidth on a hardware level¡±?
> | >
> | > If you have any questions please do not hesitate to let me know. I am
> | glad
> | > to be of assistance.
> | >
> | > Thanks and regards,
> | >
> | > Alex Zhang
> | > Microsoft Partner Online Support
> | > Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> | > =====================================================
> | > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader
so
> | > that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
> | > =====================================================
> | > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> | rights.
> | > --------------------
> | > | Reply-To: "David Bock" <David@dvbock.com>
> | > | From: "David Bock" <David@dvbock.com>
> | > | Subject: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication...
> | > | Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:58:34 -0600
> | > | Lines: 20
> | > | X-Priority: 3
> | > | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> | > | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
> | > | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> | > | Message-ID: <OsqSXo4BEHA.2888@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
> | > | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
> | > | NNTP-Posting-Host: cust-216-59-196-46.t-speed.net 216.59.196.46
> | > | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
> | > | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.win2000.networking:57914
> | > | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
> | > |
> | > | Hi, I have a WAN with a central location. We have a router with 3
ISDN
> | > lines
> | > | going to various locations.
> | > | We wanted more bandwidth, so I am updating some of the lines to DSL
> | > through
> | > | a VPN.
> | > |
> | > | We set the DC at a sub location (it is a seperate trusted Domain) It
> | seems
> | > | that when I switched the connection over to broadband the 2 servers
> | > | communicate with all available bandwidth. There is no way to even
> access
> | > the
> | > | internet around the tunnell. We have a database ap that needs to
run,
> | and
> | > | this unstoppable chat pegs my connection.
> | > |
> | > | I was able to wok around this by throttling the bandwidth down to
384K
> | > | through my VPN. I would like to leave the tunnel up with all
available
> | > | bandwidth. Is there a way to do this on a hardware level?
> | > |
> | > | Thanks,
> | > | David Bock
> | > |
> | > |
> | > |
> | > |
> | >
> |
> |
> |
>
- Next message: Phil Teale: "Routing table question"
- Previous message: Louis Hardy [MS]: "Re: Wireless LAN"
- In reply to: Alex Zhang: "Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication..."
- Next in thread: Alex Zhang: "Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication..."
- Reply: Alex Zhang: "Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|