Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication...
From: David Bock (David_at_dvbock.com)
Date: 03/13/04
- Next message: markPanger: "Company PC Win2k doesn't see Home WinXp"
- Previous message: Jetro: "Re: MRxSmb - 8003"
- In reply to: Alex Zhang: "RE: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication..."
- Next in thread: Alex Zhang: "Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication..."
- Reply: Alex Zhang: "Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 09:52:15 -0600
Thanks Alex...If I may call you Alex.
I have 3 subnodes and 1 central office.
->ISDN lines at remote locations start at a Pipeline ISDN router (10.0.x)
network, I have each node set as a class C, a server at each location.
->Internal ISDN router is a Ascend Max (10.0.1.1)
-> Internet connection is through a Netscreen Firewall, We have a VPN
connection set through this. (10.0.1.2)
-> Internally we use a company called T-Speed for a broadband connection
(Microwave 1-6MBPS) at main location
-> On Node 10.0.3.x we also have a T-Speed Connection
-> DNS server uses 10.0.1.1 as gateway, which forwards to 10.0.1.2 for out
to the internet.
-> I have disabled the 10.0.3.x ISDN connection, and enabled an internet VPN
through my Firewall (10.0.1.2)
-> Windows 2000 Network Main domain is on 10.0.1.x (GC at 10.0.1.20, Exch
Server 10.0.1.30)
-> on node 10.0.3.x there is a trusted domain (I didn't set it up)
-> When we set up the VPN the remote server took all available bandwidth
through the tunnell, and there was no room for other traffic through the
connection. I throttled the connection down to 384k, and I was able to
access the internet.
-> The ISDN is a dual B channell (384K)
-> switching over, I disabled the ISDN connection through the Ascend, and
enabled the VPN
-> Database is on 10.0.1.20 (Master GC) and I if the connection goes down we
cannot access the database, so I think it is all in 1 place
-> Right now I have a router problem, so 10.0.4.X, 10.0.5.X cannot see the
internet, I have a the person who sold me the ISDN routers coming by today
to fix that problem.
-> Before I throttled down the bandwith the VPN tunnel expanded to the full
bandwidth available from traffic between the servers, and there was no
available bandwidth for anybody.
-> I would (ideally) like to be able to have the connection be down and use
the SQL at all locations, but I have security concerns.
-> I think that there is a better way for the directory structure (as in
sub-domains not trusted Domains)
-> I would like to let all connections run at full speed.
-> I have a 512K DSL connection that I will be changing over at 10.0.4.X
once we get this all figured out.
I really apreciate your help on this, I understand what I needed to set up
the Active directory on a local system, but I am not sure once we get to
WANS and routers how things need to be to replicate. Is there a book or text
I could use to help me through this?
Thanks again,
David Bock
"Alex Zhang(MSFT)" <v-qiz@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3UaG3IDCEHA.600@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl...
> Hello David,
>
> Thank you for posting here.
>
> If I understand the issue correctly, you have a central location and
three
> sub locations. You connect these three various locations with 3 ISDN
lines.
> Now you are going to update some of the lines to DSL with VPN.
>
> To understand the issue better, I'd like to confirm the following
> information with you:
>
> 1. How do you update ISDN to DSL? What¡¯s the varieties on hardware? Do
you
> use a router or other hardware? Any detail informaiton about the network
is
> helpful.
>
> 2. How do you switch the connection over to broadband the 2 servers
> communicate with all available bandwidth? Do you modify the configuration
> on the router or using other methods?
>
> 3. What¡¯s the value of all available bandwidth?
>
> 4. Does the database locate in the central location?
>
> 5. Which location can not access internet?
>
> 6. Do you have any other concerns?
>
> 7. Can you explain in detail ¡°leave the tunnel up with all available
> bandwidth on a hardware level¡±?
>
> If you have any questions please do not hesitate to let me know. I am
glad
> to be of assistance.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Alex Zhang
> Microsoft Partner Online Support
> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security
> =====================================================
> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so
> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.
> =====================================================
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
> --------------------
> | Reply-To: "David Bock" <David@dvbock.com>
> | From: "David Bock" <David@dvbock.com>
> | Subject: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication...
> | Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 10:58:34 -0600
> | Lines: 20
> | X-Priority: 3
> | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
> | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> | Message-ID: <OsqSXo4BEHA.2888@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
> | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
> | NNTP-Posting-Host: cust-216-59-196-46.t-speed.net 216.59.196.46
> | Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
> | Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.win2000.networking:57914
> | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.win2000.networking
> |
> | Hi, I have a WAN with a central location. We have a router with 3 ISDN
> lines
> | going to various locations.
> | We wanted more bandwidth, so I am updating some of the lines to DSL
> through
> | a VPN.
> |
> | We set the DC at a sub location (it is a seperate trusted Domain) It
seems
> | that when I switched the connection over to broadband the 2 servers
> | communicate with all available bandwidth. There is no way to even access
> the
> | internet around the tunnell. We have a database ap that needs to run,
and
> | this unstoppable chat pegs my connection.
> |
> | I was able to wok around this by throttling the bandwidth down to 384K
> | through my VPN. I would like to leave the tunnel up with all available
> | bandwidth. Is there a way to do this on a hardware level?
> |
> | Thanks,
> | David Bock
> |
> |
> |
> |
>
- Next message: markPanger: "Company PC Win2k doesn't see Home WinXp"
- Previous message: Jetro: "Re: MRxSmb - 8003"
- In reply to: Alex Zhang: "RE: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication..."
- Next in thread: Alex Zhang: "Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication..."
- Reply: Alex Zhang: "Re: Bandwidth Hogging by server communication..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|