Re: Re: SFM, SMB and ExtremeZ-IP - boiled down?
- From: Bonedoc <UseLinkToEmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 May 2005 12:35:33 -0400
"William Smith" wrote:
> In article
> <2_589373_34e91876c6e83414b263229518a801c7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Bonedoc <UseLinkToEmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jim, William...
> > We do have a lot of ?creatively? named files that have been
> an issue
> > in the past. Seems that SMB does ?not? support those (and
> that may?ve
> > been GOOD
> > before they were created) and so we need the function of
> ?weird? file
> > name support (/$#* and etc) from ExtremeZ-IP. In addition,
> and I?m
> > still checking, the PASSWORD support thru our NT based (soon
> to be all
> > Win2003Server) is only eight letters... I?m checking to see
> if the
> > ExtremeZ-IP supports the full 14 that NT currently allows.
> >
> > Many thanks... any other thoughts on this greatly
> appreciated.
>
>
> To allow your Macs to use long passwords when connecting to
> Windows
> servers, install the Microsoft UAM found here on Microsoft's
> site
> <http://www.microsoft.com/mac/otherproducts/otherproducts.aspx?pid=window
> s2000sfm>.
>
> I believe it allows up to 14 characters for Windows NT
> passwords and up
> to 64 characters for Windows 2000 and higher servers.
>
> This works for SFM but maybe not for EZIP. I've never tried.
> I'd bet
> EZIP may have its own mechanisms for handling long passwords
> if it can't
> use the UAM.
>
> Hope this helps! bill
> --
> William M. Smith
> (Microsoft Interop MVP)
Thanks William... good to know and I?ll go download it.
Yes, I "think" ExtremeZ-IP may have its own devices for long files
names but they have not answered that question yet. I intend to test
it today.
The issue may be mute. I misread the price for ten users (we have 8 or
9 users in a 50 user office) and see the corrected cost would be near
the price of a Mac Server... so we are weighing those two options. The
Server would work well with our users, I?m TRYING to determine how it
would interface with our NT/Win2K Network (soon to be just Win2K/2003
Srvrs) so not sure
which way to jump...
Thanks for any input...
Doc
--
Posted using the http://www.macforumz.com interface, at author's request
Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards
Topic URL: http://www.macforumz.com/Windows-2000-SFM-SMB-ExtremeZ-IP-boiled-ftopict149224.html
Visit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.macforumz.com/eform.php?p=589707
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SFM, SMB and ExtremeZ-IP - boiled down?
- From: William Smith
- Re: SFM, SMB and ExtremeZ-IP - boiled down?
- References:
- Re: SFM, SMB and ExtremeZ-IP - boiled down?
- From: William Smith
- Re: SFM, SMB and ExtremeZ-IP - boiled down?
- Prev by Date: WINS for Mac?
- Next by Date: Re: WINS for Mac?
- Previous by thread: Re: SFM, SMB and ExtremeZ-IP - boiled down?
- Next by thread: Re: SFM, SMB and ExtremeZ-IP - boiled down?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading