Re: Can't connect OSX 10.3 & OS9 clients to same Win2k Share

From: Jeff Roseman (Roseman_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 10/06/04


Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:37:03 -0700

What about Windows 2003 Server would that help?

"William Smith" wrote:

> In article <14bba9fe.0410051217.1bcbbb45@posting.google.com>,
> jeff_roseman@hotmail.com (Jeff Roseman) wrote:
>
> > Our existing OS9 clients have no problem connecting to our Win2k SP4
> > server using AFP. However we have some new OSX machines that do don't
> > connect properly. When browsing the file share they see everything,
> > but when you click on some folders and most files, the file just
> > disappears (this only happens with file sthat show no icon). We also
> > get an error 50 when trying to connect to the share using SMB. OSx
> > clients are running the latest UAM for OSX.
> >
> > What are we missing or doing wrong?
>
>
> Hi Jeff!
>
> First, the UAM will only apply to AFP connections that you make. It will
> not come into play when connecting via SMB.
>
> To maintain interoperability with your Mac OS 9 machines I would suggest
> you use AFP and not SMB. Mac OS X's version of SMB will split the Mac
> files into two files to preserve data and resource information but Mac
> OS 9 clients won't be able to read the two files as one from the server.
>
> Mac OS X is unfortunately very poor in reading Windows Server volumes
> because its version of the AFP protocol is 3.x and Windows Server still
> uses AFP 2.2. These two protocols are not completely incompatible but
> not very compatible.
>
> One solution for you is to use Group Logic's ExtremeZ-IP
> <http://www.grouplogic.com/products/extreme/overview.cfm> on your
> server, which uses the AFP 3.x protocol. However this is an expensive
> solution.
>
> Hope this helps! bill
> --
> William M. Smith
> (Microsoft Interop MVP)
>



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OS9 - Windows 2000 SP4
    ... We have it connecting to AFP. ... >> We just installed some updates on our Windows 2000 SP4 box and now all ... > Are your Mac OS X machines connecting via SMB instead of AFP? ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.macintosh)
  • Re: PC network problem
    ... you _are_ using AppleTalk to mount that volume. ... afp over appletalk is no longer supported. ... AFP over TCP is supported by Windows NT/2000/XP/2003 Server as a ... AFP between two Macs running Mac OS X 10.5.2. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.system)
  • Re: OSX 10.3.4-Please Help V.Slow Browse of Win2k Server
    ... William Smith suggested connecting via smb instead of afp. ... >> At present it is quicker to browse the server on a Beige G3 running OS ... Due to the architecture of the Mac OS X system, ... >OS X 10.3.x to a Windows server I'd suspect it's because Windows server ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.macintosh)
  • Re: SFM + 10.3 Access to folders very slow
    ... We did not see it in previous releases of the Mac OS ... this time the workarounds are to use folder views or use SMB shares. ... Server-side: Win2003 - Server with SFM and one Macintosh ... When I mount this shared servervolume on the mac with AFP ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.macintosh)
  • Re: SFM and Long Filenames in Win2K Server
    ... We have a 2K server, and all of our Mac Clients are having issues ... SFM only supports 31 characters but your Macs are probably trying to ... I suggest you look into using another AFP ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.general)