Re: Programmatically mount W2K AFP share

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

From: Eric Chamberlain, CISSP (eric.chamberlain_at_newsgroups.nospam)
Date: 06/19/04

  • Next message: Sune: "Re: Printing from mac thru 2000 server" 
    Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 03:04:01 -0700

    "Lorenzo Thurman" <lorenzo@nospamthethurmans.com> wrote in message
    news:lorenzo-6201E0.14150018062004@msnews.microsoft.com...
    > In article <eEJDZtVVEHA.556@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>,
    > "Eric Chamberlain, CISSP" <eric.chamberlain@newsgroups.nospam> wrote:
    >
    > > If you are running Panther, why use AFP? The MS UAM is not very good,
    use
    > > CIFS and the machines can connect without any special configuration on
    the
    > > servers.
    > >
    > > "Lorenzo Thurman" <lorenzo@diespammerhethurmans.com> wrote in message
    > > news:lorenzo-7D44D1.22544317062004@msnews.microsoft.com...
    > > > I have a program which mounts afp shares via IP. It works fine when
    > > > mounting volumes on Apple servers and Unix servers running Netatalk. I
    > > > can mount these silently w/o user interaction. The password is taken
    > > > from the Keychain and the target volume is mounted but I can't mount
    AFP
    > > > shares running on W2K. I found the MS UAM for 10.x, but I can't mount
    > > > the volume silently, the auth box comes up. Is this possible with or
    > > > without the UAM? I would prefer not using the UAM, but from what I've
    > > > come to understand in researching the problem is that W2K will not
    > > > support Apple encryption, thus the need for the UAM. This needs to
    work
    > > > with Panther (10.3). Can anyone help me out with this?
    > > > TIA
    > > >
    > > > --
    > > > "My Break-Dancing days are over, but there's always the
    > > > Funky Chicken"
    > > > --The Full Monty
    > >
    > >
    >
    > I would like to use that, but I get bad username/password error
    > connecting to the server using it. I read in another post that there is
    > a LAN Manager setting that needs to be turned off for it to work, but I
    > can't find it. I've already used Directory Access to put my computer
    > into the correct domain, and I can connect to other Windows servers,
    > just not this one.
    >
    > Do you have any ideas?

    Mac's don't support SMB signing without ADmitMac, other than that, they work
    with Kerberos or NTLMv2.

  • Next message: Sune: "Re: Printing from mac thru 2000 server"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [help] 1 cpu to rule them all
      ... >> configuration and maintenance in one place is a lot more economical than ... it isn't the price of the hardware that makes it ... > You can make things easier by having lots of machines that are virtually ... > directories) on servers. ...
      (comp.os.linux.hardware)
    • Re: Creating and AD domain
      ... > None of these machines are reachable from the internet, ... > access the internet, using existing DHCP and DNS servers. ... > As of now, I've got a domain created, the domain controller is up and has ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
    • Re: How to access I/O port directly in VC6.0?
      ... As soon as you have standalone machines, ... Their "security" as far as servers was a joke; ... discovered the internal wireless network was completely unencrypted. ...
      (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
    • Re: Web Services DNS Round Robin
      ... w/ a LB machine inbetwen holding the single IP w/ several machines behind ... or later, as a DNS server. ... Suppose you have 50 identical www.heaven.af.mil web servers running on IP ...
      (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
    • Re: Groklaws "Bias" and the SCO DDoS Attack
      ... My machines will fall over before the downstream pipe fills up. ... LAN - again providing you have incoming links fast enough to make a ... You can put your web servers in the dmz and still not ...
      (comp.unix.sco.misc)