Re: Help with local adming rights on workstations
- From: "Ken B" <none@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:58:04 -0400
There was a patch somewhere along the way that would make the RG policy
additive. I don't recall the number that fixes this, but I know one's out
there. Someone on here definitely has the number if you can't find it in
the MSKB.
Ken
"Denis Wong @ Hong Kong" <H_O_T_A_P_P_S_@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:us8q3pgoFHA.764@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hi,
>
> Can you separate your computer objects in different OUs linking to
> different
> GPO w/ RG?
>
> br,
> Denis
>
> "TechMasters" <kiosk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:n031g1hg4hu288dsq78mq0n7f4f65d901t@xxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> I am currently controlling admin privileages on local AD workstations
>> by using Restricted Groups, however I have a need in a particular area
>> to explicitly and individually add select users to the local machine
>> admin group, which prevents me from using RG (unless I create a ton of
>> GPOs)
>> I still would like to use RG to add my management groups consistently
>> to the local admin group on the machines, but using RG will erase any
>> manual additions to the local admin group. any ideas? I have too many
>> desktops to do this manually (over 4000)
>
>
.
- References:
- Help with local adming rights on workstations
- From: TechMasters
- Help with local adming rights on workstations
- Prev by Date: Security Configuration Editor - Custom Settings Removal
- Next by Date: Re: GPO question
- Previous by thread: Help with local adming rights on workstations
- Next by thread: Re: Help with local adming rights on workstations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|