Re: Security
From: George Hester (hesterloli_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/03/05
- Next message: George Hester: "Re: I thought I knew Group Policy but Obviously I don't"
- Previous message: Bob: "new @ GPO. App Assigning question"
- In reply to: Andrew Mitchell: "Re: Security"
- Next in thread: Andrew Mitchell: "Re: Security"
- Reply: Andrew Mitchell: "Re: Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:56:07 -0500
Not exactly. It's easy enough to call me a whiner when security fails. What would you like for me to show that although
I may be whinning the issue still occurs or is for you "whinning" the be all and end all of the issue?
I had set Group Policy on the domain controller so that the client could not change their homepage. Obviously that
worked for changing the homepage on the client was unavailable. Now you tell me what more I could have done?
Changing the homepage on the client was UNAVAILABLE. GREYED OUT. NOT POSSIBLE TO CHANGE THE
HOME PAGE ON THE CL:IENT. Please tell me what more I could have done?
The client while connected to the domain controller visited a page on the net that used IE vulernabilities to change the
home page. The new homepage was UNAVAILABLE on the client to change. GREYED OUT. NOT POSSIBLE
TO CHANGE THE HOME PAGE ON THE CLIENT.
I had to remove the Group Policy so that I could restore the client's homepage AND clean out the registry entries that
were changed. The client had no access to the registry but the IE security issues sure did. Whinning OK. These
security issues will never be fixed if that is all you consider is important here. I think it is IE security issues and you think
it is "whinning." No wonder these issues persist.
-- George Hester _________________________________ "Andrew Mitchell" <amitchell@removecasey.vic.gov.au> wrote in message news:Xns95F2F252F6846AA12F32EDB83F@207.46.248.16... > "Simon Geary" <simon_geary@hotmail.com> said > > > What vulnerabilities in particular are you referring to? I am not aware of > > any IE security holes that will allow Group Policy to be overridden, could > > you flesh this out with some more detail? > > > > He's just a whinger compaining that a web page can overwrite the homepage > setting defined in a GPO. He's complained about this before. > news://uX5IdVlBFHA.2316@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl > > Doesn't want a solution. Just wants to vent a little I guess. > > > -- > > Andy.
- Next message: George Hester: "Re: I thought I knew Group Policy but Obviously I don't"
- Previous message: Bob: "new @ GPO. App Assigning question"
- In reply to: Andrew Mitchell: "Re: Security"
- Next in thread: Andrew Mitchell: "Re: Security"
- Reply: Andrew Mitchell: "Re: Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|