Re: Windows Explorer NoNetCrawling

From: Bruce Sanderson (Bruce.Sanderson_at_junk.junk)
Date: 11/10/04 

Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:26:40 -0800

OK. I'll try out the Policy branch via Custom ADM and report back - might
be a while! 

-- 
Bruce Sanderson MVP
It's perfectly useless to know the right answer to the wrong question.
"Mark Renoden [MSFT]" <markreno@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message 
news:eF7ZZGrxEHA.3212@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Hi Darren
>
> My experience is that Windows honours these policies.
>
> Kind regards
> -- 
> Mark Renoden [MSFT]
> Windows Platform Support Team
> Email: markreno@online.microsoft.com
>
> Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to email 
> me; I'll post a response back to the group.
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no 
> rights.
>
> "Darren Mar-Elia" <dmanonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message 
> news:ukELu8qxEHA.3108@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> Mark-
>> That KB article is surprising to me. It seems to say that any registry 
>> key under, for example, 
>> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\, can be 
>> "moved" to 
>> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\ 
>> and the underlying application will properly find and respect it as a 
>> policy. Is that really true across the board? I am quite surprised if it 
>> so.
>>
>> -- 
>> Darren Mar-Elia
>> MS-MVP-Windows Server--Group Policy
>> Check out http://www.gpoguy.com -- The Windows Group Policy Information 
>> Hub:
>> FAQs, Whitepapers and Utilities for all things Group Policy-related
>>
>>
>>
>> "Mark Renoden [MSFT]" <markreno@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message 
>> news:uHB1xMqxEHA.2016@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>>> Hi Bruce
>>>
>>> You can create a custom .ADM that won't tattoo the registry by 
>>> following:
>>>
>>> 323639 HOW TO: Create Custom Administrative Templates in Windows 2000
>>> http://support.microsoft.com/?id=323639
>>>
>>> By utilising the policies branch in the registry, you avoid persistent 
>>> settings.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> -- 
>>> Mark Renoden [MSFT]
>>> Windows Platform Support Team
>>> Email: markreno@online.microsoft.com
>>>
>>> Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to 
>>> email me; I'll post a response back to the group.
>>>
>>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no 
>>> rights.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Bruce Sanderson" <Bruce.Sanderson@junk.junk> wrote in message 
>>> news:uF$xndfxEHA.3072@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>>>> I've looked in the spread*** from 
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=7821C32F-DA15-438D-8E48-45915CD2BC14&displaylang=en, 
>>>> but can't find a Policy setting that is equivalent to 
>>>> HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Advanced\NoNetCrawling.
>>>>
>>>> HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Advanced\NoNetCrawling 
>>>> appears to relate to the Windows Explorer, Tools, Folder Optons, View, 
>>>> Automatically search for network folders and printers.
>>>>
>>>> When this item in View has a check mark, NoNetCrawling is zero; when it 
>>>> has a check mark, NoNetCrawling is 1.
>>>>
>>>> Now, I know I can set NoNetCrawling in a Logon Script or by using a 
>>>> Custom ADM template, but these would not establish a "Policy", but 
>>>> rather "tatoo" the user's registry.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way to set NoNetCrawling as a "Policy"?  I'm prepared to 
>>>> create a custom ADM, but I'm not sure what Policy registry entry to set 
>>>> to accomplish this.
>>>>
>>>> When users have a check mark in "Automatically search for network 
>>>> folders and printers", Windows Explorer appears to use excessive CPU 
>>>> time on our Windows 2003 Terminal Servers.  Note that I have already 
>>>> have hotfix described in KB article 831129 installed and have set 
>>>> NoRemoteRecursiveEvents and NoRemoteChangeNotify to 1 using a Custom 
>>>> ADM and a Group Policy Object.  These did make a difference, but 
>>>> Windows Explorer is stil using excessive CPU time when users have a 
>>>> check mark in "Automatically search for network folders and printers".
>>>>
>>>> I've turned this off via the Tools, Folder Options, View gui for a few 
>>>> users that Task Manager showed their explorer.exe process using a lot 
>>>> of CPU time. This improved the perceived performance for those users 
>>>> and ameliorated the heavy CPU load, so now I'd like to turn this off 
>>>> permanently for all users.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Bruce Sanderson MVP
>>>>
>>>> It's perfectly useless to know the right answer to the wrong question.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>