Re: Workstations looking for Old Policy

From: Mark Renoden [MSFT] (markreno_at_online.microsoft.com)
Date: 10/27/04


Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:08:58 +1000

Hi Russ

Probably. You might be better off getting a Windows XP client with GPMC
involved. This way you can drill down to the GPO's that the AD thinks it
knows about, find the offending policy and delete all the links that it has.

Is it possible you're looking at a replication problem as well? Do the DC's
have a consistent view of policies? You can check this with

    gpotool /verbose

best piped to a text file for review later.

Kind regards

-- 
Mark Renoden [MSFT]
Windows Platform Support Team
Email: markreno@online.microsoft.com
Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to email 
me; I'll post a response back to the group.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
"RussH" <rhogue@ccoe.net> wrote in message 
news:2be0b247.0410270904.35d2481a@posting.google.com...
> Mark,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I think an over zealous sysadmin thought he was helping. He has a
> habit of pruning where he shouldn't. Unfortunately he's the boss. It
> does keep things interesting though.
>
> I suspect he deleted the directory
>
> If I had an old backup and restored the directory for the policy would
> the policy show up in Group Policy Editor?
>
> Russ
>
> "Mark Renoden [MSFT]" <markreno@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message 
> news:<#EwCg9#tEHA.2192@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl>...
>> Hi Russ
>>
>> When you say it was erased, how did this happen?  What set of steps 
>> erased
>> it?
>>
>> Kind regards
>> -- 
>> Mark Renoden [MSFT]
>> Windows Platform Support Team
>> Email: markreno@online.microsoft.com
>>
>> Please note you'll need to strip ".online" from my email address to email
>> me; I'll post a response back to the group.
>>
>> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no 
>> rights.
>>
>> "RussH" <rhogue@ccoe.net> wrote in message
>> news:2be0b247.0410211458.79035ec6@posting.google.com...
>> > Our Windows XP Pro workstations are looking for an old policy that was
>> > inadvertantly erased.
>> >
>> > I created a new GPO on the Win2k Server and applied it to the OUs.
>> >
>> > The application log on the workstations are giving me Events 1030 and
>> > 1058.
>> >
>> > Error 1058 says "Windows cannot access the file gpt.ini for GPO CN="
>> > and the following Unigue ID is the old ID for the GPO that was erased.
>> >
>> > Any Idea why the new policy is not being pushed down to the
>> > workstations.
>> >
>> > Any help is much appreciated.
>> >
>> > Russ 


Relevant Pages

  • Windows Shortcut Keys and "ALT+TAB" not working because of GPO
    ... We've got an issue with a machine policy which prohibits us of using Windows ... Deny access to this computer from the network Support_388945a0, ... Policy Setting ...
    (microsoft.public.de.german.windowsxp.gruppen.richtlinien)
  • Re: GP errors
    ... Then later shutdown second one and start the first one. ... machine (MTCCSAPROUTER) to the domain and those errors are not coming. ... The policy for which it is giving access denied error is the Default ... Windows cannot query for the list of Group Policy objects. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
  • Re: Implementing EFS for select users
    ... It depends on if the workstations are Windows 2000 or XP Pro. ... uncheck the box that allows EFS to be used. ... on all computers at the domain level via Group Policy and then add the four ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: Server 2K3 Remote Desktop Access - is this right place?
    ... All roads for that particular error of 'You do not have access to logon to ... On Windows Server 2003, launch GPEDIT.MSC from Start -> Run. ... Drill down and expand the following for Local Computer Policy: ... > Strange - when I activate the Remote Desktop Terminal from the server, ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.advanced_server)
  • Re: Important information about XP SP2 .ADM Files
    ... The Windows 2000 fix is available here: ... >> your attention to an important issue related to Group Policy. ... >> an important issue around the use of the .ADM files we ship with XP SP2. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.group_policy)